Home/Videos/Global Meet-Up
Transcript · Global Meet-Up

Global Meet-Up #3 (New York City): The Eschatology of Capitalism

Aug 16, 20262 h 36 min24,011 words · 104 min readYouTube

Edited for reading: misheard names and places corrected, punctuation restored, and stutters, false starts and filler removed, with his wording otherwise kept. The edit was made with AI assistance; switch to the original captions to compare. Highlighted passages are predictions we track.

Thank you so much. It's great to be back in New York City, and tonight there's a lot to discuss. What I want to focus on tonight is the Iran war, of course: why it's happening, where it's going.

The main argument I want to make today is that the war in Iran is not a traditional war that you can analyze from a realist perspective. It's not about resources. It's not about power dynamics. It's fundamentally an eschatological war. And that's the argument I will make to you today.

But it's a very complex argument and I'll go step by step. Okay. So I'm going to treat this as an ordinary day in the school and you guys will be my students, so the general rule is feel free to interrupt. I am working not from rigorous scholarship. I'm working from game theory. So all the ideas that I'll explain to you tonight should be... Okay? If at any point you're like, "You know what, that doesn't make sense," please raise your hand. Please interrupt. Okay. We have a great crowd today. It's packed, and so I'm really looking forward to participation, to debate, to dialogue.

Okay. So that said, let's begin. All right. So let me first explain, in very simplistic terms, the nature of the global economy that we have today. Okay. So there are two main pillars. There is the Middle East, the GCC, and then there is East Asia. And how the current economy works is the GCC provides the world with cheap energy. Okay. So this energy is sold primarily to East Asia, and East Asia of course is the manufacturing hub of the world. So it takes the energy, turns it into manufactured goods, and then it moves over to the west, which consumes these manufactured goods. And this, in very simplistic terms, is how the global economy is structured.

Now there is a particular quirk to this system, and it's all being undergirded by the US dollar as a global reserve currency. So what happens is the GCC sells the energy in US dollars and then US dollars are recycled back into the US economy. Same thing with East Asia, where East Asia will sell its manufactured goods in US dollars, and then it will recycle the US dollars back into the US economy. Okay. And the idea of the United States as a global reserve currency, it is unique in human history and it has been a disaster for the United States as a nation state.

Okay. And there are three reasons why. The first reason is that the United States loses all financial... Okay. So the United States must guarantee the free flow of US dollars, and the United States has created a financial system in order to facilitate the free flow of capital around the world, and this is not good for the United States because you lose financial independence. The idea of this is the Eurodollar system. Now, the idea of the system is all the US dollars start outside the United States, and quite honestly we have no idea how many US dollars are outside the United States.

And so this dollar system actually makes no sense from a national perspective. You have absolutely no idea how many US dollars are in circulation. You have actually no control over how it is circulated. Okay, so that's the first problem with this system. The second problem with the system is... which basically means that in order for this system to work, this global economy to work, the United States has to become the financial center of the world and shift resource extraction and manufacturing to the other parts of the world.

So you hollow out your manufacturing sector. You no longer produce anything. You just speculate. Okay. And we understand the problem with the system. It leads to corruption. Corruption of course just means Washington DC. Washington DC is the most corrupt place on this planet. You get nothing done unless you're willing to bribe Congress people to do what you want. Okay? So corruption is a huge issue. You have inequality, right? So think of New York City. I was in Santa Monica. Santa Monica last week was the most ridiculous place in the world.

Okay, it was just so silly. You have the Pacific Palisades, you have the $100 million mansions, you have Skid Row where they're all on drugs. It's just ridiculous. Okay, inequality, and of course you have debt. Okay, so it's almost like Americans exist in order to go into debt, in order to fuel the global economy. So again, this is terrible for American citizens. Okay, the third thing is just Pax Americana. And what I mean by that is this system is predicated on peace in order for people to trade with each other, right?

So people need free access, free open maritime navigation for the system to work. And the United States must guarantee this free maritime navigation, which means a bloated military budget. Okay. The United States must basically ensure the entire peace of the world, which causes tremendous military pressure on the United States. If you think about it, this makes no sense, because the United States doesn't actually need a military. Okay, I know this is hard for Americans to understand, but the United States doesn't need a military because there's no nation in the world that would actually dare to invade the United States.

Okay. So all that money that goes to the military could instead be spent on things like free college or free healthcare. All right. But the United States, because it is forced to protect global trade and ensure free open maritime navigation, then it needs this $1.5 trillion Pentagon budget. Okay. All right. So this is the world as it is. And as you can appreciate, this is not really sustainable. Okay. And so what we're seeing right now is the system breaking apart because of the Iran war. All right.

So before I continue, any questions about this? Is it all pretty clear?

Yes.

What are the benefits to the US system?

That's a great question. So the main benefit is Wall Street is very happy with the system. Okay. So you've got this financial hierarchy that benefits tremendously from the system. All right. And that's why we still have the system. Yes.

I think you said there's no way to figure out how many dollars are outside of the US or in the Eurodollar system. Why is there no way to calculate?

Okay. So there's no way to calculate because of a variety of factors. Okay. The first is money is not printed. Money is just created off a computer screen. Okay, that's number... and banks actually have the capacity to create their own money. Okay, that's number one. Number two is there's a lot of counterfeit money in the system. All right. Okay. Does that make sense?

Yes.

You're saying that if the US did not have a military, even then other nations would not have dared to invade the US. Are you saying that because the US has a geographic advantage as a part of being in the western hemisphere?

Yeah. So the United States, it's impossible to invade because it's protected by two oceans, the Pacific and the Atlantic. That's number one. Number two is there are a lot of guns in America. Okay? All right. There's no military, but you come and invade America, guess what? You'll be fighting for every street corner. Okay? It's just a pain in the ass. Why would you do it?

Yes. Sorry. I was just going to ask, you say there's a breakdown, but I just want to know what the symptoms of the breakdown are. What are we seeing right now that shows that there's a breakdown going on?

Well, I explained corruption, inequality and debt, okay, and that's why the system is not sustainable, okay.

I just mean, how do we see that in front of us? What do we see? What are the things that we see physically as those symptoms?

Okay, so the clearest symptom of a breakdown is the 2008 great financial crisis. Okay, that is when the United States government bailed out Wall Street but not homeowners. And the idea behind this is the idea of regulatory capture, where Wall Street, the financial elite, are able to control the policy levers of Washington DC, because from just an economic policy perspective, you actually want to bail out the homeowners and not Wall Street, right? Because if you bailed out the homeowners, that allows for a more efficient economy, but because you bailed out Wall Street and not the homeowners, you create a K-shaped economy now.

Part 210:08

Okay. So the K-shaped economy is basically the best indicator that the system is about to break down. Yes. So if we don't need this big of a military and we just said that we're going to be spending $1.5 trillion on our military, which is clearly corruption, who is benefiting the most from this corruption? Because it's not like...

Yeah, the military-industrial complex.

But who specifically?

Okay. So get on a train and go to Washington DC and go to the suburbs. Okay. In the suburbs, Fairfax County, Alexandria, they're all mansions. You go back 20 years, right, before the war on terror, you go to a place called... So the wealthiest place in America is actually called Loudoun County, Virginia. All right. 20 years ago, the per capita income of that place was 30,000. Today, it's 90,000. It tripled in 20 years' time. What happened? The war on terror. That's what happened. Okay. So it is the military-industrial complex.

Yes.

Why has financialization led to inequality? I get it, but I'm unable to break down the... because white collar jobs necessarily are a successor to financialization. You have people working in offices, doing IT jobs, tech jobs, sort of abstracted away from factory jobs, and those were supposed to create.

Okay, so that's a really good question. So why would financialization lead necessarily to inequality? The reason is that, if you read Thomas Piketty's book called Capital in the Twenty-First Century, he explains this very clearly, and the idea is that for capital to be lucrative, it consolidates. Okay. So what happens is that once capital consolidates, its returns are very, very high, much higher than if you actually engage in real work. Okay. So for example, if you opened a factory you might have a 2% return a year, but with financialization, the stock market, if you invest in the stock market you get 5% a year.

So in this system the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. Okay. All right. Yes.

In your model, the premise right now assumes that America was structured and designed to be an ethnostate. But in some of your previous lectures, you mentioned that the founding idea of America was that if you give citizens or people the ability to buy private property and do whatever they want, that is the incentive that the government would want to create. And so by having open capital accounts, a strong banking system, technically we could just say everything you're saying are manifestations that would happen in every civilization throughout time. Inequality and all of these diseases, this warfare has been going on since before Homer.

And so we just have a different paradigm of a different country that in this current world is not the ethnostate, but we have a hallucination that it is.

Okay. So I'll explain this later on. Okay. So I apologize, I forgot I'm in New York City, not in China. Okay. So we have to cut this out. Okay. But there's one last question. Yes.

Yeah. I was wondering, if the GCC pulls out the money from the stock market, it's going to be an issue. I don't know if that's what you said, but I looked it up and the GCC only accounts for like 1 to 2% of the US stock market. So how would that have a profound effect?

Yeah. So, I mean, okay. So when we say the GCC and East Asia recycle the US dollars in the US economy, that doesn't necessarily mean the US stock market. It could also mean hedge funds. It could also mean real estate, right? Because the stock market is only a very small portion of the US economy. Okay. All right. But I'll explain more as we go on. Okay. All right. So let's go on. All right. So now I want to explain the war in Iran and how it is spinning out of control.

Okay. So originally the war was between the United States and Iran. Okay. So the United States' strategy going into the war was very simple: decapitation, which means you knock out the leadership and then everyone else, because they love democracy, they love freedom, they love human rights, they love OnlyFans, whatever. Okay, they rebel and then you have a democracy. Okay, that was literally the plan going into the war. Didn't work out. The Iranians are much, much more resilient. The Iranians have countermeasures against the strategy, including closing off the... primarily going to East Asia.

So this creates a bottleneck in your entire global economy, right? This disrupts the model that I previously presented. But not only that, as this war is progressing, the Houthis have been brought into the war. Okay, the Houthis are a huge problem because they control another strait called the Bab el-Mandeb. Okay. And it screws Saudi Arabia. All right.

Hezbollah and Israel are at war. Then Iraq is also at war right now. As you know, recently there's been a Middle East military alliance signed by three countries: Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan. Okay. This is Turkey right here and this is Pakistan. All right. So what I think is going to happen is Saudi Arabia sees the Houthis as an existential threat and they will move against the Houthis. They're probably backed by Israel. Israel has military bases over here. Okay, so they've surrounded the Houthis. The problem with this system is the Iranians have figured out that if you have four points of attack, okay, including Hezbollah, which can attack the Shal, the Houthis, which can block the Bab el-Mandeb strait, and then Hamas.

PredictionSaudi Arabia will move against the Houthis, likely backed by Israel.Came true

What you've done is you've choked off the entire Middle East. Okay? And also, you know, the GCC saying, "We'll just build pipelines," you know, that's... Okay, because if the drones can attack ships they can probably attack pipelines as well. It's probably easier for them to attack pipelines because they're so huge, right? So the GCC is simply screwed. But it also shows you that because they're proposing to build pipelines, which cost billions of dollars and years to build and they're not really a solution, it tells you that they don't really know what to do.

They're really screwed in this. Okay. Now what's important to also remember is that Russia, regardless of what happens, can always supply Iran from the Caspian Sea, and China, with its Belt and Road Initiative, can supply using railways. And so what's going to happen is that this war has to expand globally. Okay. You have this problem in the Middle East and then it's going to link up with the war in Ukraine and this will be a global situation, and this is going to destroy the global economy. The issue with this is, remember, these countries recycle US dollars back into the US economy, especially Japan, right? Remember Japan has $1.1 trillion of US treasuries. What Japan does for the global economy is provide liquidity.

PredictionThe Iran war will expand globally and link up with the Ukraine war, destroying the global economy.Open

All right? And so the idea is something called the Japanese yen carry trade. You guys may know what this is, but the idea is it's really the dumbest thing in the world, where the Japanese banks will lend money to Japanese corporations at a 0% interest rate. And the idea is, well, when you do that you are providing liquidity for the Japanese economy, right? Because deflation is a huge problem in Japan. The Japanese corporations are like, well, we could do that, but there's a much simpler way to make money, which is we'll go buy US treasuries at 5%.

Okay, we're borrowing money at 0%. We are getting 5% by buying US treasuries. So we'll take that free 5%. Thank you very much. Okay, and so because Japan does this, what it's really doing is providing liquidity for the world. Okay? And the liquidity, by the way, is about $4 trillion.

The problem with this is Japan gets most of its oil and energy from the Middle East. So the second thing is oil and energy investors are like, maybe I shouldn't put my money in Japanese yen, right? So now the Japanese yen is sinking. And so what the United States is doing is, okay, we need to save the Japanese yen, because if the Japanese yen sinks then the Bank of Japan is going to recall all this liquidity from the world to save the Japanese yen, and this will cause economic collapse in the United States. Remember, 50% of US GDP growth is AI data centers, right? So it's a bubble, so you need this liquidity from the GCC, from China, from Japan.

This war means that these countries will have to be much more nationalistic and so liquidity will dry up, which will eventually cause US collapse. There's just no way around this. Okay? So given the situation, there is a way for the United States to win this war. Okay? And all the United States has to do is two simple things. If it does these two simple things, this war in Iran will end right away and the US economy will be saved. Okay? So the first thing the United States can do is give Iran $2 trillion.

PredictionLiquidity from the GCC, Japan and China will dry up, causing US economic collapse; the AI and private credit bubble will pop and the dollar will move toward zero.Open

Part 320:31

Okay? And this would be a disaster for Iran. So the historical example is of course something called the Plaza Accord. The Plaza Accord happened because Japan at this point in history, the 1980s, was the dominant manufacturing power in the world and the Japanese yen was very weak, which meant that the Japanese were absorbing liquidity from the world. Okay. And this was causing huge problems for the US economy and for the global economy. So the Plaza Accord was an agreement between Japan and the G7 nations, Europe and the United States, that Japan would increase the value of its currency.

Okay. And this allowed Japan to buy property really cheaply overseas. Okay. And so now you've reversed the situation. Before you were absorbing liquidity and now you are transferring liquidity to the world. Okay. And so this was terrible for Japan because it led to 30 years of deflation, stagflation, economic silency, but it was great for the United States, right? So why not just do this for Iran as well? Give Iran $2 trillion. It's US dollars. So they're eventually going to have to recycle it back into the United States economy, right?

They'll buy resources to rebuild. A lot of this, US companies will be allowed to go to Iran to rebuild infrastructure, to sell oil around the world. It's great for everyone, right? So that's number one. Okay, $2 trillion. But there's something else that has to happen, which is contain Israel. Okay. Israel. Yes, I understand. Yes. Okay. But let me finish. Okay. Let's pretend that... Okay. Okay. Israel is a huge problem in the Middle East because they're always going out starting wars, right?

So what you do is say to Israel, we're going to embargo you, no more weapons for you guys, and we're going to sanction you. If that would happen, peace would come to the Middle East.

Right? Just do these two simple things, we would all live peacefully ever after and the global economy will be saved. Okay, we know for a fact none of these things are going to happen. Okay, so this is really strange. How do we get in a situation where 8 billion people, the fate of 8 billion people on this planet, is all being determined by this one little country, okay, of what, 9 million people in the Middle East. The country is so small, you can't even find it on a map of the Middle East.

So this is the question we will examine. What is going on, where the United States, the most powerful country in the world, is not able to protect its own national interests and is only advancing the interests of this, again, really small nation in a desert somewhere, right? And what we've already discussed, the consequences for this war are just tremendous. It's the end of civilization basically, but the United States is still allowing Israel to do whatever it wants. Okay. All right. So the main argument I want to make to you today is this war makes no sense unless you look at it from an eschatological perspective.

This war is meant to usher in the end times. This war is meant to bring in the Messiah if you're Jewish and to have Jesus return if you're Christian. That's the only explanation for what's going on. If you look at it from any other lens, it makes absolutely no sense. Okay, any quick questions? Yes.

That model fails to acknowledge Islam. Iran is a big player. You're saying the return of Jesus and then you're saying the end of time for the Jews, but then you have the Shia, Islamic, and you have the Sunnis. Why are they missing in the model?

So you're right in that there are religious fanatics in Iran. Okay. Shia martyrdom is a very powerful force, but it is only a minority within Iran, right? So if you go to Tehran, the capital, most people are secular. The intellectual class, the government bureaucrats, a lot of them are secular. And it's the same thing in Israel, where you go to Israel, 40% of Israelis are actually secular. So what's really strange about the world we're living in is history is being determined by this very small minority in each of these different nations, whether it be Iran, Israel or the United States.

Yes.

Just to respond to this, there's the 12 Shia, 12 Shia Islam, right? That's the eschatological belief within those groups. Right. So just watching your lectures, Iran's not the enemy in this war. It's the United States, to remove the United States from the Middle East to establish, you know, Israel and the Greater Israel project and establish it as the hegemon in the Middle...

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So when I say the end times, I mean they have to fulfill a certain prophecy and I'll explain what this prophecy is. Okay. All right. So guys, guys, guys, we'll be here all night if... Okay. All right. All right. So that's number two. Okay. So number one is we've established how the global economy works. Number two is we've looked at how this war threatened to destroy the global economy and how this war is really being fought on behalf of Israel.

Okay. Now what I'll try to do is explain how it is that we got to this unique moment in history. So I'll explain to you the history and origin of capitalism. All right. So it is a historical accident. I know that most of you believe that capitalism is just the best way to run the world. But what I want to show you is that in fact it's a convergence of several historical accidents that has created the world that we live in today. Okay. So the first historical accident is Calvinism.

And in Calvinism there's a very important idea called double predestination. And double predestination, the idea is at the beginning of time when God created the universe, he already decided the destiny of everyone. He already decided who is going to go to heaven and who will go to hell. Okay, so double meaning heaven and hell, predestination means it's already been decided. It was a rhetorical response to the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church was able to control people because the Catholic Church could determine whether or not you went to heaven or hell.

That was the source of the power. And Calvinism tried to subvert the power by saying, "No, the church doesn't have this power. Only God has this power and God has already decided." So no matter what you do, no matter what the church says, your fate has already been decided, because at this point in history, indulgences were a huge problem. Indulgences were bribes to the church so that if you're a bad rich person you could basically get to heaven still. Okay. So Calvinism, what's really interesting is it creates a moral dilemma that didn't exist before, which is how do you know if God has chosen you or not?

Right? Before, you would know because the church would tell you if you were selected or not. But now you have to believe if you're chosen or not. And so the way they remedied this is through the idea of wealth creation. Okay. Basically, if you're wealthy it means God favors you. That makes sense, right? But the other thing that's interesting, Calvinism demanded that you make wealth but at the same time also not spend your wealth, because you have to prove you are a good person, right? So you make a lot of wealth but you can't even spend your wealth.

And this goes against human intuition, because historically when we make a lot of money, the first thing we do is spend on our friends and family, right? Because we take this wealth and we transfer it into status for ourselves in a community. And that's what intuitively we did in the past. But now Calvinism breaks this cycle and says, "No, no, no. If you make a lot of money, you also have to save it, which basically means you have to invest it." And this is weird, okay? But this basically creates capitalism.

Part 430:03

You can't spend your money. You can only save it. And because of this concept, you now have a new entity in the world called the Dutch Republic. And what the Dutch Republic would do is take people's savings and then start these enterprises around the world that led to a spice monopoly. And at this time in history, spices are the most valuable thing in the world. And the Dutch Republic, because of Calvinism, now becomes the wealthiest region in the world and they create really the world's first idea of a middle class.

Okay, this leads of course to something called the Dutch Renaissance. The problem with this is the Dutch Republic used to be part of the Habsburg Empire and now that they're so wealthy they're constantly being invaded. So you have all this money. You have to protect this money in order to get to heaven. How do you prevent the Catholics from coming and stealing your money? Okay. This led to something called the Glorious Revolution. Okay. 1688, Glorious Revolution. This is the second historical accident.

So the Glorious Revolution is really a marriage of the dominant Protestant powers in Europe at this time, which are England and the Dutch Republic, right? So with the Glorious Revolution, what happens is the Dutch Republic now transfers their gold, their wealth, to England. Why? Because England is an island protected by the Royal Navy. The Royal Navy is invincible, right? So it's really the best place to store your money. The Glorious Revolution then leads to the chartering of the Bank of England. Okay, this is the third historical accident.

The Bank of England, 1694. The Bank of England is unique in history because it's run by merchants, right? Historically, merchants would lend money to kings for their wars. The problem is the kings could die. They could lose the war or they could be like, "Screw you. I'm the king. I don't have to pay you back." Right? So this was always a huge problem for these merchants. The Bank of England solved this problem because they're lending money not to the king but to Parliament. Okay? So basically the Bank of England, and again it's so weird if you think about it.

It is a private bank that is guaranteed by the people of England. Okay? Now you're lending money not to the king but to the English nation, which basically means that as long as there's one Englishman alive, that person has to pay you back. All right. So it's a really weird system, but this creates our modern financial system. The Bank of England model of course will be copied with the Federal Reserve. Okay, so the Federal Reserve system in the United States is modeled on the Bank of England system.

Now this system is great because what it allows is basically infinite financing. So the example is the Napoleonic wars, when England was trying to fight Napoleon for dominance in Europe and England lost six times. It only won once, but England only needed to win once because it has infinite financing. No matter how badly Napoleon defeated them on the battlefield, England could just print money and say, "Okay, we'll bribe you Prussians or Russians to go fight another war." Okay? And so the Bank of England basically creates the British Empire.

Okay? So capitalism, then what happens of course is these ideas will then spread to the United States and create the American empire. All right. So these are all historical accidents. Calvinism was an accident. Glorious Revolution, Bank of England, United States. These are all historical accidents. Okay. But once you have these accidents in place you now have to explain them. You have to create a philosophy or religion, a bureaucratic system in order to manage these accidents. Okay. So now I'm going to explain to you how they did so. But are we clear so far?

Yes.

One question. So a lot of this looks like the act of money lending has been encouraged, eased up, or just increased over time. Why is that? Many religions discourage that, advise their followers not to.

Yeah, exactly. So most religions, I would say all religions, banish usury. Okay. Why? Because usury was the most destructive element in society. It basically caused all societies to collapse sooner or later. So all religions ban usury. Judaism is unique in that it only bans usury for the members of the religion. So if you're Jewish, you can't lend money at interest to other Jewish people, but you can lend money at interest to Gentiles. Okay. But all the religions ban usury because it was such a socially volatile force, right?

Yes.

Not that I disagree, but what makes each event an actual accident? The Calvinism one I understand a bit more. Yeah.

But the charter and such, accident.

Right? Okay. So when I mean accident, I mean they were not planned strategically. They were all responses to a specific problem that arose at that particular time. Okay. Does that make sense?

Okay. Thank you. All right. So now I'm going to explain to you the philosophies that developed because of these historical accidents. Okay. Now you have capitalism. Now you have to explain capitalism to the people. All right. So they had certain philosophers in place to develop a system in order to explain capitalism to the people and to justify it. Okay. So one concept that arose is democracy and private property.

If you think about it, these two things are actually a structural... You guys live in the United States. You think this is the most normal thing in democracy. Of course you have private property. But actually, if you think about it logically, it doesn't make any sense, because private property basically means an oligarchy, right? Democracy means rule by the people. So the people choose, if they vote to say, you know, we want to redistribute wealth, they should be allowed to do so because it's a democracy, right? But private property, the idea of private property is it is an inherent and inalienable right given to you by God.

Therefore, you are not allowed to touch each other's private property. Okay? So we have this system as a response to the Bank of England, because the Bank of England is private property, but it's guaranteed by the people. So how do you alleviate this contradiction? By saying to people, well, we have a democracy. Okay? You choose to respect each other's private property. Does it make sense? Okay. So this is a contradiction, but this arose because of the inherent contrary nature of the Bank of England.

All right. Another contradiction that arose at this time is that reason and emotion were distinct. You guys don't appreciate this, but this is actually a revolution in human thought, because if you look at every other culture before, reason came from emotion, right? The idea that you could think independently of your emotion was ridiculous to everyone. Go read the Greeks, go read the Chinese. In every ancient civilization the heart and the mind are aligned. In fact, in China we say the heart is the mind. Okay, you think of your emotions, and all the neuroscience tells us that is true.

Okay, our memories are essentially emotions and our memories become the units for our thinking. But so the question is, why did they come up with this silly idea that again is counterintuitive, the separation between reason and emotion? And the answer is because of what reason means. Okay, reason in this formulation actually means capital, and emotion means family, tradition, nation, community. Okay, does that make sense? So in order for capital to win, it's transnational capital, there has to be a free movement of goods, people and ideas, and whatever obstructs the free movement of capital is inherently bad, and they're labeled as emotions.

Okay, does that make sense? All right. So again, we think these things are just intuitive. But if you think about it logically, it makes no sense, and they came up with these formulations as a response to the distinct nature of capitalism at this time. Yeah.

So you say that in the French Revolution they saw God as reason, and in Greek literature they see the gods as emotions.

They act in the world. So is that why, when they started to see God as reason and then they conflated reason with capital, that's how we got to where we are?

Okay. All right. So that's a really good question. Okay. But let me explain the history. Okay. All right. Let me finish this section and then it'll become clear to you. All right. So you have these ideas that are contradictions that must come in place in order to allow for transnational capital to dominate the world. Okay. The first is democracy and private property are not contradictions. They are intertwined together. They are the one and the same. The second is that reason and emotion are separate.

Part 540:22

Whereas before in human history we saw them as one and the same. Okay. So in order to promote the system of transnational capital you need both a public layer as well as a secret layer. Okay. The public layer is just what we call philosophy, and the three main philosophies that developed in order to justify the system are empiricism, skepticism and utilitarianism. Okay, David Hume, Jeremy Bentham, John Locke. Okay, I won't go too much into it, but there's a secret layer to all this. The secret layer is Freemasonry.

All right. Freemasonry is the religion of reason. If you read Freemasonic texts, whether it be Albert Pike's Morals and Dogma or Manly P. Hall, they use a phrase over and over again. It's the idea of a holy empire of... What is this? It's a holy empire of capital. Okay. So again, this is really important for us to appreciate. Reason in their eyes is capital. All right? And this created a... in human cognition, because before, if I met someone I might be like, okay, where are you from, right? That's the first question I would ask you: what community are you part of? Right now I might be like, how much money do you have? You understand. Okay, again, this is the United States, so you think this is the most intuitive thing, to judge people by how much money they have. But historically we judged people by the community that they come from.

Okay. The god that they worship, who their fathers are, who their parents are, right? Okay. So this is the idea. Okay. Freemasonry was developed in order to better organize, structure and manage capitalism secretly. Right? Because remember, the idea is democracy is just a facade created in order to fool people to agree to let bankers run the world. Okay. But you need a real management system, and this real management system is called Freemasonry. All right. Okay.

Were religious organizations against it or were they part of it?

Excuse me.

Were the religious organizations, the Catholic Church, with this? I mean, okay with this, or within?

Yeah, that's a great question. Okay. All right. So let's use game theory. Okay. So the question is, okay, you have this secret organization called the Freemasons and they actually are transnational capital and they want to conquer the world and spread capital everywhere. There must have been organizations against this system. Well, there were. Okay. The problem is that this system is set up so that capitalism will always win out. Okay? So if you go align yourself with capitalism then you win out. If you go against capitalism you lose out. Right? So think of history, where things like monarchy, organized religion, the Catholic Church, basically community, they're all being withered away, right?

Okay, so you see all this massive migration to the United States and into Europe. You're like, well, who's doing this? And the answer is it's capitalism, guys. Okay, capitalism demands a free movement of people, goods and ideas. And so if you try to stop them, then they see you as an enemy. Okay, but let me use game theory to explain what's going on. All right, so transnational capital is the most powerful force in the world, and so if you go against transnational capitalism, you will be destroyed. Okay. And if you look at the movement of human history for the past 200 years, it's been the triumph of transnational capitalism.

Okay. So the first example is the French Revolution. The Enlightenment is really the expression of capitalism, the political expression of capitalism, right? What does the Enlightenment call for? The Enlightenment calls for the free movement of ideas, people and goods, right? Okay. The Enlightenment leads to what? The French Revolution. Then what happens? You have the rise of communism. Now, what's really interesting is if you talk to these Freemasons, they think communism is the best thing in the world. Why? Because communism is a triumph of human reason above emotion.

Right? Communism demands that you put the public good, the reason, above family, community, emotion, love, nationalism. Okay, that's what communism is. So if you look at the past 200 years, 300 years, it's been the relentless march of human reason, of capital, but taking different guises, taking different forms, whether it be the French Revolution or communism or capitalism. Okay. All right. Does that make sense? All right. So let me explain what's been happening. Okay. So I say Freemasonry is the organizing system behind capitalism. But what does that mean?

Okay. So transnational capital means capital across different nation states. Okay. When you do that you have a problem. And so what they realized is if you're able to solve three problems you will triumph. Okay. The first problem is information. Second problem is infiltration. The third problem is coordination.

So the classic example is the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds had their family spread out in the different capitals of Europe, including Frankfurt, where they're from, but also Paris, London, and one story that stood out is the 1815 Battle of Waterloo. So the British and the Prussians fought Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo and of course Napoleon lost. Now the Rothschilds had agents to monitor the battle. When the battle was decided, the agent got on a corvette, which is a fast ship, and sailed across the English Channel and told the information to Rothschild three days before the public knew.

Okay. During these three days, there was a wild panic because, for the reason, we don't know who did it, but there are rumors going around that the British had lost the battle. All right. Okay. So this is the idea of information, infiltration and coordination. Information means how do you access information quicker than other people. Infiltration is how do you put agents into certain places that allow you to access sensitive information, and coordination is how do you work across different nation states in order to break the game in your favor.

Okay? And the best way to do this is through secret societies. Now at this time in history there are maybe three transnational forces in Europe. They are of course the Freemasons, they are the Jesuits and they are the Jewish diaspora. Okay. And eventually what they realize is, well, you guys, we could just work together, right? When you combine the Masons with the Jesuits and with the Jewish diaspora, you get an organization called the Illuminati. All right. The Illuminati. All right. So the best way to understand this is, okay, I'm not saying they're planning this out.

Okay. What they are doing is this. Okay. There are different organizations, and they all have a range of certain behavior. Okay? There are people within the Catholic Church who are pro-transnational capital, people who are against transnational capital. What I'm saying is that secret societies are a convergence point of these different organizations, and because they're able to coordinate secretly together, they will always win out. Okay? Does that make sense? All right? So I'm not saying that most people are part of a secret society.

I'm saying if you choose to be part of a secret society, you will be at a greater advantage than if you are not. Okay? If you're just a government bureaucrat, you'll just be a government bureaucrat for the rest of your life. But if you're part of a secret society and you're a bureaucrat, then your friends will help promote you in the bureaucracy. Then you'll be given investment opportunities. Then your children will be allowed to go to the most elite universities. Okay? So it is to your advantage to join the secret society.

Okay. All right. Does that make sense, guys? Yes.

So you named three of them, but what are the organizations or institutions that lost out? Who can trace their history to see them degraded as a result of this coordination?

Okay, that's a great question. Okay, so one thing I disagree with people about is how these societies are continuous, right? So what people say, okay, was well, it started out with the Knights Templar, which was the original secret society, and then it evolved to become the Freemasons, and then they become the roian the... and I don't believe this is what happened. I believe that secret societies are just a natural byproduct of transnational capitalism, because the way to win this game is by forming secret societies. But secret societies usually revolve around a charismatic figure, okay. So maybe the charismatic figure will say, we'll start a new organization called Skull and Bones, right, and then very successful people gravitate towards him. But eventually what happens is these people become very arrogant, their children become very arrogant, and the secret society gives way to other secret societies. But what I think is true is the most powerful secret societies are eschatological. Okay.

Part 650:58

So what I mean by that is if you're so excited and you're like, you know, we're here to make a lot of money and enjoy ourselves, you won't do as well in the long term as, we're here to serve God and we're here to bring God to our world. We're here to usher in the end times. Okay? And there are certain reasons why. The first reason is if it's eschatological, it's a script that you can play out over centuries. If it's not eschatological then it usually revolves around a charismatic leader, who when he dies the organization devolves. Okay, that's the first thing. It can span centuries because it's a script. The second thing is that you can have more people participate in the movement, right? You can scale it out if it's eschatological. And the third thing is people tend to be much more energetic when they think, oh, I'm going to bring about the end times. We are going to take the world to paradise, right?

This is a jihad. Okay. So societies that are eschatological tend to do better than secret societies that are not eschatological. Okay? And specifically, secret societies that practice the Cabala do the best. All right? The Cabala. So now what I'm going to do is explain to you the Cabala. Okay? So if you know Freemasonry, if you read books like Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike, they're very open about the structure, and what you'll recognize is Freemasonry tries to be the religion of reason. It tries to absorb all the best practices of every single religion out there and come up with, you know, the empire of reason.

And so maybe at the bottom levels you'll have Pythagoras, the Egyptians, but as you go up, the highest level, it's the Cabala. Yes.

Why did the Freemasons feel that reason was above emotion when they founded Freemasonry? What led them to the decision? Was it coordination? They felt reason as opposed to...

Okay. All right. So they didn't plan this out. Okay, remember all this is a response to a certain problem, right? So you are trying to spread transnational capital around the world. And so how do you convince yourself and others that capitalism is good? Well, what you do is you create a distinction between reason and emotion, where reason is capital, right? Let's make things for money, and emotion is prejudice, right? "No, I can't make money because my religion doesn't allow for it." Okay. So that's what happened.

It isn't like, you know, the Freemasons had an epiphany which is like, oh my god, reason and emotion are separate. No, no, it was a response to a problem that they had. Okay, does that make sense? Okay, so the Cabala, what was the Cabala? Okay. And again I want to be concise. Okay. The Cabala. It is an understanding of how the universe works. Okay. Why are we here? Where are we going? Where did the universe come from? And what the Cabala says is that God is the will to bestow.

Okay. He's God, right? He's all generous and he wants to share himself with others. Problem is there's no one to share it with. So to know itself, to complete itself, God creates Adam Kadmon. Okay. The first man, the cosmic man, and Adam Kadmon becomes the will to receive. Okay. But if you're the will to receive, you see things purely from an egotistical perspective, which means you don't really appreciate why God wants to give you anything. So you reject God's gift. And when you reject God's gift, the universe breaks.

Okay? And so now you have the separation between us and God. So the purpose of the universe is to come to an enlightenment so that we're able to receive God's gift. This could mean spiritual alchemy. Okay. All right. And that is the Cabala at a very general level. There are radical factions who read the Cabala and they interpret it literally, okay, through the lens of the... And so they take this idea that the entire purpose of humanity is to seek reunion with God. And they use the Bible as a script or as a plan.

And they interpret it literally, which means to say they want to seek reunion with God by acting out God's divine plan as told in the Bible. Okay. And what this divine plan basically means is, okay, well, the Jews must first return to Israel in order to fulfill the covenant between the Jews and God. Then the Jews must build the Third Temple as a resting place for God. And this will initiate the war of Gog and Magog. And when the Jews are most in need, then God will come and save them and save the world.

Okay? Because what we... of God means is opening your heart to God. And this means to repent. Okay? So this is how they interpret, and again I'm talking in very general terms, but this is how they interpret their role literally. Okay, this is why we're seeing what is happening in the Middle East. Why are the Israelis committing genocide in Gaza like that? That's just insane. You don't have to do that, guys. Okay, but they're perfectly doing it and they're doing it in 4K. Why? Because they want the whole world to see this.

Because they want to initiate the war of Gog and Magog, which will force the Israelis to come together. Okay, that's why antisemitism is growing in the world, and this will force the world... of Gog will force the Jews to repent and turn to God and then the world will end. Okay. And then they can build the Third Temple. This is why it's happening. So I want to explain why the Cabala is so powerful, and it's so powerful because there's a sexual desire that the Cabala unleashes, right? Because it's sexual, the idea of reunifying with God. Okay, we were part of God, we left God and now we will become one with God again. It's a sexual union, and that excites people.

Okay, I hate to say this, but have you guys seen Pete Hegseth give press conferences? When he's talking about the war, it's almost like he's having an orgy. Okay, he's having an orgasm. Okay, and it tells you this guy's been reading the Cabala a lot. I'm serious. These guys who are committing genocide like Pete Hegseth, they literally see it in sexual terms, like, you know, we're so close to achieving the end times. We are so close to becoming one with God. Okay. They're excited about it.

All right. Okay.

I don't get it.

Excuse me.

I'm listening the whole time and I really don't get why people really believe that this is how you get close to God. Killing and killing and killing. That's so far from love.

Yeah. Okay. That's a great question. Okay. So from an intuitive perspective, it makes no sense, because why can't you just open your heart and welcome God? And the answer is it's too goddamn slow, man. Okay, you could do it, but can your neighbor do it? Can your neighbor's neighbor do it? Probably not. Okay, but for the Cabala to work out, everyone has to do it. So how do you create the condition so that everyone is forced to do it? So my question is, as a kid, because I grew up in a very religious home, when I was being conditioned I would always ask, well, why only one type? Would God choose a chosen people? That makes no sense to me. It felt, even as a kid and even now as an adult, it feels like that's a false god, that's a false belief, because my intuition doesn't believe this, the whole world.

Yeah, okay, that's a great point. Okay, so you can argue there are a lot of logical fallacies within Judaism, especially messianic Jews. Okay, you can say they're crazy. The problem is the world is not run by reason. The world is not run by who's right or who's wrong. The world is run by those who are willing to sacrifice themselves in order to achieve what they want. Okay, that's the issue. Okay, these people are crazy, but that's why they run the world, because they're willing to make sacrifices that no one else is willing to do.

Part 71:00:09

So the example I have is, you guys remember this Muslim who killed these two Christians outside the Israeli embassy in Washington DC? Do you guys remember that incident?

And this was a married couple. They were Christians and they were, I think, volunteering at the Israeli embassy, and they caught a Muslim and he was clearly drugged out. I don't speculate too much, but there are people online who think that these two Christians purposely martyred themselves in order to advance the Zionist cause. Okay. Does that make sense?

For them death means nothing. If I die in order to accelerate the coming of God, then it's worth it.

But it's not coming. That's the whole thing again. It's not about who's right and who's wrong. It's about who's willing to work the hardest to achieve his or her ends. Okay. And these people are the craziest. So they usually get what they want. Okay. So think of the Israel lobby, which is basically just one issue, right? If you go against Israel, we'll come after you. We'll spend like $30 million. And Thomas Massie was this one lone voice in Congress.

He was completely powerless. He was a pain in the ass. But honestly, who cares? They spent $30 million to get rid of this guy. Then you have, you know, Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, right? $30 million spent by AIPAC against him, and then $60 million total against him. So they're fanatical, right? You're like, is it really worth it? You might have like five people in Congress who are against Israel. Everyone else is for Israel. The map still is in your favor, right?

They don't care. If one person, we don't care who it is, that one person is against us, we'll go after that person and make sure he or she can never be in Washington. Okay. So it's fanatical. Yes. Did you have a...

9/11 was a sacrifice. So let me continue. Okay. Then 9/11 will make sense. Okay. So you're like, okay, well, you have these religious fanatics. Yes.

Before we continue on this topic, how come China doesn't have corresponding organizations or societies, capitalists, etc.?

Yeah. Because China has families. Okay. So families take the place of secret societies. Right. Because China is not transnational. China works within its own borders. So you don't really need secret societies in order to win out. Okay. So families in China won out over secret societies because families are much more close-knit than civil societies. But in the western world, where the geography is much more spread out and where cultures are much more diverse, the civil societies will win out over families.

Okay. Does that make sense? All right. All right, guys, we can be all that. Okay. But let me finish my point. Okay. So I'll do one more section, which is, okay, we have a question, which is, okay, you've got these crazies in these secret societies that want to usher in the end times, but this is bad for transnational capital, right? And the answer... and so what I want to show you now is actually if you're transnational capital you like these guys. Okay, so we're seeing an alliance between transnational capital and messianic secret societies. And this is why we live in the world that we live in.

All right. So let me explain to you why, as a capitalist, I actually like these guys. All right. So one thing to keep in mind is capital has no value in itself. Capital is a tool for me to extract your energy, your attention, your consciousness. Okay? Does that make sense? All right. So if I'm a traditional capitalist and America is so wealthy, rich, right? So filthy rich, right? I'm in New York City. Maybe the average family here, I'm saying hypothetically, each family has a million dollars. That means the kids don't have to work, right?

But if the kids aren't working, then the system breaks down. So I need to create a condition where people are forced to work. So capitalism creates wealth but it also must destroy wealth at the same time. It doesn't make sense, right? And the best way to destroy wealth is through war and revolution. All right. So this is how capitalism will work, and again I'm not saying this is a plan, but I'm saying this is the nature of capitalism to do this. All right. So I'm the United States, and it's the wealthiest country in the world and all the capital is here.

But this has led to moral, social and political decay, right? Too much debt, too much corruption, too much inequality. And now I can't invest in the United States because I can't get any returns, right? What do I invest in in the United States, AI data centers? There's no return in that. Okay? So this war in the Middle East, which will usher in Pax Judaica, this is the best investment opportunity for me right now, right? Because imagine, okay, maybe 5, 10 years down the road the Middle East is destroyed. Well, it's good for me, because if you're destroyed I can now rebuild. Okay, so coming here I took the New York subway and I was like, wow. And you guys have to take this every day, man.

That's going to tell. And I'm like, okay, what do you do with the New York subway? Because it's going to cost you a fortune to renovate it, right? And it'll take you forever to renovate it. So your only solution, if you're a capitalist, is to burn it down, right? Is that the cheapest way, the most effective way to renovate the New York subway? You just burn it down first, right? Otherwise it's taking like 50 years and billions of dollars, $200 in order to actually make it modern, right?

It's just cheaper and faster. Just burn it down. But if you want to burn down the New York subway, you probably have to burn down New York City as well, right? But I'm telling you this, this is how these guys think. How do I get the best return for my money? And the best return for my money is to invest in places after war, after destruction. Okay. So they moved their capital to Israel, to Pax Judaica, and a lot of this capital is also going to Argentina, Australia, Ukraine, the Mediterranean.

Okay? So basically places that are virgin territory, right? And it's all being anchored by Pax Judaica. Does that make sense? All right. So when the money shifts away from the United States, you have economic collapse. Economic collapse leads to civil war. Now New York City is burned down. The New York subway is burned down. Which means what? Which means now I can invest in a new subway system. So now after maybe 10, 20 years, my capital can return to the United States. Okay. So another way of saying this is the only way for capitalism to work is a constant cycle of destruction, revolution and war.

PredictionMoney shifting away from the US will cause economic collapse leading to civil war in the US.Open

Without these things, capitalism cannot work. Okay, it doesn't make sense. So you think, okay, well, these cabalists are crazy, but these capitalists are kind of crazy too. So, okay, that is it. I look forward to your questions. Okay. All Well, we'll do a fireside chat first, right?

Okay.

Okay. Cool. So I took a lot of questions that you guys put in the questionnaire and compiled them, and I'll ask them right now, and afterwards we'll do a broader Q&A so anyone can ask any other question.

So we'll just start with the first question here. Does China have similar secret societies? What does it look like? I know we kind of talked about it but...

Yeah. Right. So there are secret societies in China. There are secret societies everywhere. And they're basically family focused. Right. So it's usually one family and it's usually a criminal organization, triads, and then they obtain power and they become legitimate.

So the Chinese system, the problem with the Chinese system is that it's not transnational. It's only within a certain ethnic network, so it's much more limited in scope. The other issue with the Chinese secret societies is they're not eschatological. They're political, but they're not eschatological.

Can I ask a follow-up question? I heard, I may be wrong, but I heard that the south, they have infiltrated into the top CPC officials, and have been since they came to China in 194... So it never... That's what I heard. But whatever it is, and they're now kind of in China. Do you see that the Freemasons are as determined as before in the 1950s to scramble strand of China, just like...

Part 81:10:18

Yeah. Okay. So China is in many ways colonized by secret societies, by transnational capital. So the goal of transnational capital is to go to a place and extract as much energy as possible and transfer it into capital, and that's what's happened in China. And you know, I would make the argument that China has really been hollowed out, right? So in the 80s and 90s transnational capital went into China and built factories in order to extract the energy of its demographic, and then afterwards... and I don't think people appreciate this, but China could have only embarked on its infrastructure spending with the aid of China capital, right?

Because you needed resources to build these highways and skyscrapers. So capital allowed China to buy these resources from Australia, from South America. Because at that time, 2008, there's an agreement between the Bank for International Settlements and China to increase the value of the Chinese yuan, which allows China to buy up all these resources, and this infrastructure spending has really hollowed out the Chinese economy, because this infrastructure spending has led to corruption, inequality and debt as well. So China's basically done, and there's really no real growth potential for China, and that's why transnational capital is shifting from the United States and China to the Middle East.

PredictionChina is basically done with no real growth potential.Unresolvable

Right? Again, if I'm a capitalist, I'm a trillionaire, I'm always looking for a place which will grow. And I think the United States and China are in the same boat. They're both empires in decline.

Okay. Do you see a kind of similar repeat of what happened in the 1950s when they tried to embargo China? China will just close up and then...

Yeah. So I think what's going to happen is that China will be embargoed by its running neighbors and it will just remove itself from the global financial system, the global supply chain. It's going to turtle up. But when it does that, it's going to lead to structural contradictions. Why? Because people in the urban areas are used to a modern western lifestyle. And if there's not enough food, I know this sounds silly, but if there's not enough food, the people in the urban areas, Beijing and Shanghai, want to maintain their current lifestyle.

PredictionChina will be embargoed, withdraw from the global financial system, and suffer famine in the countryside.Open

And if there's not enough food, guess what's going to happen? There's going to be famine in the countryside. This is what happened during the Great Leap Forward as well. So I'm not very optimistic about China. And So you're saying that there will be kind of things.

I think so. Yes. Yeah. Okay. All Okay.

Next question. What are the historical analogies of the current-day technology transitions and consolidation of power?

So I see AI as a logical extension of this holy empire of reason, right? Because what you're trying to do is you're trying to allow for the rapid, almost seamless, frictionless movement of people, goods and ideas. Okay. And Freemasons appreciate that. The main obstacle on this, okay, is humans. Why? Because humans have emotions, right? And emotions are prejudices. They're biases and they prevent the seamless movement of goods, people and ideas. So you have to break that. Okay? You have to transform people. They call it spiritual alchemy. And to do that... and so AI is considered a tool in order to achieve... so that's what AI is.

AI is not just a surveillance tool. What AI is, I mean AI will help us as humans achieve full enlightenment, right? So imagine a microchip implanted in your head, Neuralink, right? That's always telling you the right thing to believe. And if we're able to synchronize all of human consciousness, then that would lead to paradise, right? Because all biases, all prejudices, all negative emotions will be wiped out from the world. Okay. So that's what's happening. AI is not necessarily a revolution. AI is just the fulfillment of capital.

Okay. What is the future state of the Middle East in the short term following the conclusion of the Iran war? And is there any realistic chance that the existing global power structures will or even can be changed in meaningful ways?

Okay. First of all, this war in Iran will never end. It just can't end because the war in Iran, it's fundamentally a conflict between capital and religion. Okay?

PredictionThe Iran war will never end because it is a conflict between capital and religion.Open

And Israel represents capital and Iran represents religion. So this is a contradiction and only one can win out over the other, but it's impossible for one to defeat the other. I mean the idea of the United States sending in ground troops against Iran, it's going to lead to a quagmire that could go on for decades. But if you're a capitalist, you don't really care, right? Because all you're looking to do is extract as much energy from people as possible. And war does that. You know, war makes people anxious.

PredictionA US ground invasion of Iran would become a quagmire lasting decades.Open

It makes them work harder. So the war in the Middle East, it's a perfect investment opportunity if you're a capitalist. And again, guys, I'm not saying this if you're a millionaire, okay? You don't matter if you're a millionaire. I'm saying this if you're a trillionaire, okay? If you're a trillionaire, then the war in the Middle East is a perfect investment opportunity.

And the question is, is there an alternative to this? And the alternative is the return to religion. So countries like Iran and Russia present a direct threat to capitalism. So they call this Duginism actually. Dugin, who proposes, who basically says capitalism is the antichrist system. All right. It's the beast and it negates all that is good in humans, and it includes family, community, emotion, emotions like love. Okay. So this is really the great struggle that humanity will face over the next 50 years, and this struggle is represented by the United States versus Russia.

PredictionThe struggle between religious nationalism (Russia, Iran) and capitalism will define the next 50 years.Unresolvable

Excuse me. You just said likeism, right? The idea of Russia operating as the katechon, for preventing the antichrist from occurring.

Do they represent one of the two figures in Gog and Magog, right? The idea of operating a massive war against this.

Okay. So there are different eschatological systems. Okay. In the Russian Third Rome eschatology, Russia is a katechon. Okay. And it's meant to stop the antichrist from conquering the world. The antichrist of course is capitalism, right? But then you have the Christian Zionist eschatology, which perceives Russia and Persia as Gog and Magog. Okay. It doesn't make sense. Okay. But these are different eschatologies.

All right.

Professor, can you speak a little bit more about the antichrist that Peter Thiel is obsessed with and what his version of... what is he trying to tell us? What is he implying with, you know, he goes and meets Javier and gives him a lecture about... what is he trying to say?

I think Peter Thiel is carrying on the Freemason tradition, and I don't know Peter Thiel, you should ask Kathy, but I think what Peter Thiel is doing is carrying on the Freemason tradition, and for the Freemasons the antichrist is whatever force that stops human reason from reaching its full potential. Okay, does that make sense? Okay, what the Freemasons believe is if everyone, if human reason is allowed to dominate, okay, then human reason can achieve godhood. Okay, our collective reason becomes God itself, as represented by AI.

So whatever force that stops the advent of reason, the advance of AI is fundamentally against God and therefore the antichrist. Okay. Does that make sense? That I think is a subtext of what he's saying.

All right.

All right. Will American universities in the GCC survive?

Nope.

Next question.

How will the Iran and Ukraine wars converge? And how will there be both an AI and private bubble crash and hyperinflation at the same time? That's a little different.

Part 91:20:12

Okay, so these wars have to converge because Russia is supplying Iran through the Caspian Sea and Ukraine sees an opportunity to combine both fronts. Okay. So Zelensky ordered a drone strike against an Iranian cargo ship transporting through the Caspian Sea. And the idea is that if you provoke the Iranians, the Iranians will begin to attack Europe and Ukraine, because a lot of drone factories are based in Europe. And so I think this will just happen naturally because it's really hard to separate these fronts, and more actors will be brought in over time because the stakes are so high.

PredictionThe Iran and Ukraine wars will converge, with Iran attacking Europe/Ukraine drone factories.Open

What's the other?

How will there be both an AI private bubble crash and hyperinflation at the same time? Okay, because the fiat currency, which is the US dollar, is moving slowly towards zero. Okay, so that's a problem, and the AI, private credit bubble will pop because liquidity has been removed from the US system. Right? So the GCC and Japan are no longer able to invest in the United States because of their own problems.

PredictionThe AI and private credit bubble will pop because liquidity has been removed, with hyperinflation as the US dollar moves toward zero.Open

Right? Yes.

So if the AI bubble crashes eventually, which is going to... could that be wealth destruction? So if the wealth is destroyed, the people have to work.

Who's going to benefit and whose wealth will be...?

Look, all these bubbles are engineered. All right. So the fact that the media is telling you the bubble is going to burst is basically telling you there are some vested interests that want this bubble to burst. And who are these vested interests? Well, I would assume the big AI companies, right? Because why would you as Omen want the bubble to burst? And the answer is the government has to come bail you out now, right? You're too big to fail. The bubble bursts, OpenAI goes bankrupt.

This is a disaster for the American economy. Therefore, Trump has no choice but to nationalize data centers, right? And why would you want that? Because now you socialize the losses and privatize the gains, right? The data centers cost you a lot of money and they're hard to implement because of community reaction, but if Trump and the United States government comes in and nationalizes these data centers, they are now military installations. Now you have eminent domain. Now the communities can't complain, right? And data centers are the main cost of AI companies.

PredictionTrump will be forced to nationalize AI data centers after an AI bubble burst.Open

So you want the bubble to burst so that the federal government can come in and save your ass and then... Yeah. Right. Does that make sense?

Okay. Yeah. Yeah.

So you mentioned this in one of your lectures as well, the engineering of bubbles bursting. I think that implies a mechanism of control. So in this instance, what would you say is the lever? Is that a sample that can cause...? That's a really good question, because this AI bubble is distinct from other bubbles, because you go back to the 2008 subprime crisis, there was a trigger mechanism, which was the home default, right? But with this AI bubble, it's circular financing. So it's basically seven companies and it's a circle jerk.

They're all financing each other, and as long as they agree to not burst the bubble, the bubble won't burst. What is the mechanism that will burst this bubble? And the answer is, well, they'll make something up. I mean, there are all sorts of pretexts, but these seven will agree at some point to burst the bubble and it will be collusion, and they are actually already... if you just watch the news, okay, so many news articles about this bubble's going to burst, this bubble's going to burst, right? They're already laying the groundwork. It's predictive programming, that's what it is.

Yes.

Yeah, my question is, what are they gaining by letting it continue to go on? I don't get why they're not just bursting it. You say that they have to time it, right? What are they gaining by letting it continue on?

So first of all, you just let it go on because it's the path of least resistance. Okay, that's number one. Number two is they can always control the time it collapses. And when they time the collapse, what they can do then is short the market to maximize their gain. So people always pick the path of least resistance. If you don't have to pop the bubble, you don't want to pop the bubble. But if you're forced to pop the bubble, then you want to pop it in a way that maximizes your gain.

Okay. Yes.

How can people in the west create an alternative to capitalism and modernity? And if wealth isn't capital, what is real wealth?

Well, first of all, real wealth is always your imagination, okay? Your attention. That's why these social media companies let you use their service for free. You think it's free, but it's not, because you're paying attention to these things. They're capturing your attention, and that's what they want, right? They're absorbing your wealth, and that's why these companies are so valuable, because you're able to control your attention. And so the alternative is for you to reclaim your attention, and this can mean reading books, but it really means you focus more on human relations.

You focus on being kind, open and generous with the people around you, on, you know, getting to know your neighbors. I was at the Pacific Palisades in LA. It was the most ridiculous, because they live in these $20 million to $200 million mansions and they don't even know their neighbors. I was talking to my friend. He's like, "Oh yeah, Steven Spielberg lives down the street." Like, "Well, are you guys friends?" Like, "No, I never met the guy." They live like three houses down.

I never met the guy. Oh, and Adam Sandler. Yeah, he's my next door neighbor. Never met the guy. Never seen the guy. It's so... Yeah. Anyway. Yeah.

Next question.

The US and China are declining empires.

Who's rising?

I think Israel is rising. I think Japan is rising. I think Poland could be rising. I think North Korea is rising, Iran could be rising. But places that are outside the capital system will rise because they have untapped potential. Places that are over-capitalistic are just exhausted. Okay. All right. So sorry, sorry guys. We'll continue the questions and we have lots of time for questions. Okay.

PredictionIsrael, Japan, Poland, North Korea and Iran are rising powers while the US and China decline.Unresolvable

Okay. What is your perspective on the apparent contradiction between JD Vance's isolationism and Trump's imperial ambitions? Do you see one faction of the Republican party winning in the end?

I actually don't see it as a battle between JD Vance and Donald Trump. I see Donald Trump as trying to navigate opposing factions, right? That's why JD Vance is still around, because JD Vance works for Donald Trump, right? It was Donald Trump who picked JD Vance, and it's Donald Trump encouraging Donald J to write a book and go on his book tour, right? JD Vance has been on a lot of podcasts, and honestly I think how politics works is if JD Vance were really against Trump, Trump would have, you know, I mean there are lots of things Trump could have done, but I think Trump is a sort of person who tries to maintain as many options as possible, and JD Vance is maintaining an option for...

Okay. Guidance on where to build a family and home given the stage of capitalism that western nations are at and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

I think that if you have a family, God will protect you anywhere. I think, you know, rather than focus on where should my family be, focus first of all on having a family, I mean you know, but also just focus on loving your children, and then God will take care of the rest.

Okay. Where do you think the US-China relationship is actually heading over the next 10 to 20 years? Is some form of long-term coexistence realistic? I think China and the United States are not natural enemies. I think both the United States and China are interested in maintaining the current global order, especially China, because China is very export orientated. So China would like as much as possible to come to a détente with the United States. The problem is the United States' internal politics makes US foreign policy very erratic. But I think that President Xi's visit next month, he's coming here to the United States on September 24th.

Part 101:30:09

That will be a very good bellwether of where things will be headed. I think there'll be a compromise of some sort. I think that things will turn around for US-China relations. Okay. So we'll finish these questions and then we'll open up. Okay.

PredictionUS-China relations will turn around with a compromise after Xi's September 24 visit.Partly

Okay. As AI gets better at more of the things we consider human intellectual work, how do you think it will change our sense of purpose and what we value as a society?

I think AI is a dead end. I think there's a limit to AI, and the reason is AI is completely dependent on the global supply chain, right? So you'd be able to access rare earths, lithium, silver really cheaply from around the globe. But if these supply chains are breaking down, then it's very hard to take AI to the next level. And you ask yourself, in a time of global disruption, is AI really the best place to invest your money? So I think we've basically reached the peak of AI and I'm not very optimistic about where AI will take us.

PredictionAI has peaked and is a dead end because the supply chains it depends on are breaking down.Open

Okay. If you could redesign high school education from scratch, what three changes would be best for preparing students for the next 20 years?

So I would say the major problem with high school education is it's fundamentally about indoctrination, and it's trying to indoctrinate students in a very materialistic... And I think that if you really want students to be engaged, if you really want students to ask good questions, to really want to learn, you need to teach them the occult. You need to teach them things like the Cabala, you need to focus on the great books, Homer, Dante, and you need to make school relevant, right? So school needs to be a place where students can learn about the world as opposed to being separate from the...

You mentioned that we imagine reality. How can we determine that this imagination is sourced from God or Satan? In other words, how can we trust our imagination? I mean I think that the imagination can only come from the monad. Okay. I think it's impossible to be imaginative in an evil way. And you know, personally, Shelley talks about this, you know, poetry. If you're a poet, okay, you're not being imaginative, you're being divinely inspired. Right. So if it's a great piece of literature, if it's really beautiful, it comes from the monad.

It's an act of imagination. And you could also say Satan doesn't really exist. What is Satan? I mean in my own conception of the universe, only the monad exists. And evil is something that we conceptualize to explain the world we live in. But you know, Dante would say the fundamental principle of the universe is free will, and if we're imaginative, real imagination comes from a place of love. So it's almost impossible to be imaginative for evil purposes.

Okay. What do you think the role of an artist is during this time?

The role of an artist is to be a prophet, right? The role of an artist is to reveal the universe, reveal the truth, and to give hope to people, to explain what's going on, but also to show new possibilities, to be a prophet. I think historically all artists were considered prophets of some sort.

Now they're just in Brooklyn drinking $10 matchas. Anyways.

What positive things can you say about this present time?

That's the last question. I think this is a very positive time, because what's happening in the world is forcing us to think deeply about who we are and what we want, right? That's why we're all here tonight. So I think 10 years ago, with my lectures, people were like, "This guy's insane, let's just ignore him because he's saying bad things and it's not comfortable listening to him, right?" But now you're seeking answers. And by seeking answers, by seeking the truth, you're actually activating the humanity in you.

Okay? Your soul, the soul in you, the spark in you that was dormant for such a long time because things are so comfortable, it's now begging for answers. And so I think this may lead to a spiritual awakening and an evolution of humanity. But this is something that is not obvious at some point, because this is something that we have to seek together, and together we will build the...

Awesome. Thank you. Those are all the questions. So we'll open it up to...

Yeah. Maybe we can pass the mic around, so we can hear the questions in the video.

Somebody have a question.

Do you just want to choose, or...

Yeah. Let's just pass it around. Okay. Yeah.

Thank you so much for giving this lecture. So you constantly return to Dante as kind of the paradigmatic great books author who redefined human experience and provided a way to view reality in a positive way. Are there any other great books, especially written following modernity? I'm thinking of Ulysses or In Search of Lost Time, or books even written now that you see as providing kind of instruction manuals for our imagination to navigate the complexities of modern life.

Yeah, that's a great question. So I really like the Russian novelists. So Dostoevsky and Tolstoy. Anna Karenina I think is really the best novel ever written. And then Karenina, and then Dostoevsky is always wonderful. Crime and Punishment, The Brothers Karamazov. But really modern writers, yeah, so I really like... what's his name? Who wrote Cathedral? Cathedral. Raymond Carver. Is that his name?

Yeah. I like Raymond Carver a lot. I think that his stories just force you to think very deeply and they're very emotional. So I would recommend Raymond Carver, Cathedral. Yeah. Okay. Hey, professor. So your argument is that Israel is the next, you know, big world power, money's flowing to Israel, etc.

And you've already said that Israel has a high birth rate, you know, three children per woman. But the demographic of Israel going forward, most births are towards the Hasidic Jews or the Palestinian Israelis, the Arab Israelis, right?

So that will lead to a very different Israel 50 years or 30 years from now.

So, you know, does that not change your Pax Judaica argument essentially? Right. So, Israel, the Israelis do not want Pax Judaica. Okay. The Israelis are fairly happy with the way things are as they are. And unfortunately, there are some messianic Jews, mainly Chabad Lubavitch. I'm not sure if you guys know what it is, but they're trying to usher in the end times and they're out of control. So what's been happening is there's sort of an internal... it's being externalized, right? So you guys may know a lot of Israelis are buying property in the Mediterranean, in Greece and Cyprus.

They're moving to Argentina. The reason is they don't like the messianic mess, right? So rather than fight them, which would lead to civil war, it's like, screw this, we'll just move elsewhere, right? So they're moving to Argentina, they're moving to the Mediterranean, they're moving to Australia, these places. But what this means is that if these people are leaving, okay, people from Tel Aviv are leaving, that means that Israel becomes even more messianic, right? The settlers have even more power. And so I see Israel transforming from a democracy to a theocracy in the next few years.

PredictionIsrael will transform from a democracy into a theocracy in the next few years.Open

I think this election in October will be very telling and it'll be very interesting to see what happens. But the idea of a democracy can't last. Okay. For Pax Judaica to take shape, what has to happen is you have to have a priest class, the theocracy, and you bring in millions of immigrants from India and they become basically your slave class, and that's what they want, and that's what they want to...

Part 111:40:13

Is that what transnational capital wants as well? They want in Israel a police class and a peasant class, I guess.

Yeah. Because that's how I make the most money, right? So Libya is destroyed, Syria's destroyed, Iraq's destroyed, the GCC will be destroyed very, very quickly, right? So now I repopulate with Indians, because India first of all has a booming population of young people who are just going to revolt if you let them stay in the country, right? So you need to remove them and send them elsewhere. Also Hindutva is a growing ideology in India which calls for Indian Zionism, and so there's a lot of alignment between India and Israel. In fact there are only four countries in the world where Israel has a net favorability rating.

PredictionThe GCC will be destroyed very quickly and repopulated with Indians.Open

Okay. And one of them actually is India. I think the others are Ghana and Nigeria. Okay. So yeah. Right. Thank you for your lecture. I'm interested to learn more about how Kabala was co-opted by the West, because from my understanding it was developed in Andalusian Islamic Spain and then spread out into Christian Europe, and now it's influencing the occult and secret societies. So how did Kabala become part of Christian Zionism? And what other occult strains do you think should be studied, both to understand the world and as an alternative to create something new?

Okay. So Cabala is interesting because what Cabala is doing really, if you think about it, is taking Egyptian hermeticism and Gnosticism and applying it to the Bible. Okay. So what makes Cabala distinct from, say, Gnosticism and hermeticism and Neoplatonism is that for them the mind of God is not really decipherable. You can't really understand the mind of God. But for Cabalists, they're like, well, the Bible is the word of God, right? And the Bible is comprised of the Hebrew alphabet. Then we can imagine that the Hebrew alphabet and numbers, numerology, are the fundamental tools that God uses to create the universe.

So if we are able to interpret the Hebrew alphabet and then numerology in a certain way, then we're able to reconstruct the very fabric of the universe. Okay, that's what makes Kabala distinct from other things, and if you think about it that's a really powerful way of understanding the universe, because if you can actually figure out numerology and the Hebrew alphabet then you can actually predict the future. And that's why the Cabala is so enticing for people, and there are practitioners of Cabala who are able to predict the future. You look at Chabad, and Chabad, I'm not sure if you guys know about the history of Chabad, but it was founded in modern-day Russia and for most of its history was ruled by first the Russian czar and then the Soviets.

And it should have been extinct many, many decades ago. It's a very small movement and now it's everywhere. Okay, it's in Ukraine. It's very close to Putin. It's very close to Trump. Javier Milei in Argentina, he's actually a Chabad Lubavitch member. Okay. So from their perspective, it's a miracle. Okay. It's divine how they were able to survive such persecution and now grow and become so powerful, and they believe they did so because of their understanding of the Cabala, but their understanding of the Cabala is also messianic and they call for the end times.

Okay. And they're so energized. I mean the history of the Cabala, sorry, the history of Chabad, it is so mesmerizing if you actually go deep into it. Okay, so I'll tell you one story. Have you guys ever asked yourself how Mark Zuckerberg became a billionaire? Because Facebook is not an original idea. There are lots of Facebook-like concepts around at that time. Why did Facebook come to dominate social media? And the answer is Mark Zuckerberg was able to take Harvard intellectual property, because Facebook is Harvard intellectual property, and he was able to ignore Harvard privacy rules, right?

Because with Facebook, you shouldn't be able to access that person's face and address and personal details, but they were able to do so. So where did Mark Zuckerberg get this power? Okay. Well, when Mark Zuckerberg was at Harvard, he was part of Harvard Chabad, which is the campus offshoot of Chabad. He was a freshman when he joined Harvard. The two seniors who were part of Harvard Chabad at the time were Natalie Portman and Jared Kushner.

The faculty advisor...

Was... Excuse me.

You said Natalie Forman.

Natalie Portman. Yeah.

You didn't know that? Natalie Portman and Jush go way back. Anyway.

The faculty advisor was Alan Dershowitz.

The patron of Harvard Chabad was Larry...

Okay. So you're like, "Wait a minute. What's going on here?" Well, okay. Here's another really interesting story you can just Google. Okay. Mark Zuckerberg said that his parents had three daughters before they had him. They really, really wanted a son. So what do they do? They went to ask for a blessing from the Rebbe Schneerson, who was head of Chabad. Okay. And the Rebbe Schneerson says yes, I will bless you. And then they had Mark Zuckerberg. You think, okay, that's a nice story, but you read the Bible, it's not a nice story.

It's actually a very messianic story, because who in the Bible couldn't have children and then asked God for a blessing and then had a child? Well, it was Abraham and Sarah, who had Isaac, right? And then Abraham sacrificed Isaac to God. But it was also the prophet Samuel's parents who couldn't conceive. So they begged God and said, look, if you give us a child we will make this child your servant, and then they conceived and had Samuel, and then Samuel became the prophet who anointed King David.

Okay. So if you know the Bible you know that when Mark Zuckerberg tells his story it's coded language. It means he's a servant of God. All right. If you look at what he's doing, creating the metaverse, why would you do that, right? So there are a lot of really strange things about Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg, and you can't explain it just using venture capital sense. For example, why does Mark Zuckerberg have complete control over the company? Why as a venture capitalist would you allow a 19-year-old, 20-year-old to have complete control over Facebook?

You guys know this, right? He doesn't have majority equity, but he has majority control. He has certain shares that give him total control of Facebook. Why would you allow that to happen, right? So there's a lot of strange things behind Facebook. Okay, now why do I say this? Because in 2016 what happened? The Cambridge Analytica scandal happened. What's the Cambridge Analytica scandal? Basically this company was able to access 50 million Facebook users' personal data and then create microtargeting that allowed the Trump team to sway the election in their favor, right?

You guys know this, right? Okay. Head of Facebook was Mark Zuckerberg. Who was head of the Trump social media team responsible for this microtargeting?

You guys know.

Jared Kushner.

Okay. Right. So you're like, "Wait a minute here, what's going on?" But you just kind of connect the dots, you get a really interesting story.

Did you read the article yesterday about Amodei's wife, CEO of Anthropic? His wife tried to raise money from Jeffrey Epstein for a female site, and she dated the CEO. It's a Wall Street.

Yeah. It's a very small circle of people, right? It's a very small circle of people. You're always able to connect these people together. Jeffrey Epstein is another person who is probably also alive about Lubavitch. All I just have a really quick follow-up.

Part 121:50:04

You still recommend children and young people to study the occult and great books, and you talk about the importance of artists as prophets. So how do you think young people can use these ideas that philosophers and intellectuals, entrepreneurs have used to spread ideas for good, and to use the occult and philosophy to create new creative ideas?

Okay. So I think people often look to me for ideas, but that's not how these things work. Once you connect back to the monad, the monad will show you the path forward, because we're here for our own individual experience, right? We all came here for a purpose and what's important is to know our purpose, discover our telos, and also to constantly connect to the monad to seek guidance. So my advice is to open yourself up to the monad, to the universal consciousness, and that will show you the path.

Looking to me won't solve anything.

All right. Keep on passing it. Yep.

I had a different question but I think I have a better one.

When you connect to the monad, what is your path?

What is my path?

My path is to be a teacher, right? I mean, from my life I asked myself, what are things that I do that are smooth? What are things that I do which are not smooth? If it's smooth it means I'm probably following the path the monad wants for me. If it's not going well then it's probably not the path I want. So what I've learned is to trust the universe more. Right? I'm in New York City because someone wants me here, right? And there's actually a possibility I didn't get into New York City, because I'm talking with my son and I didn't know this, but the United States, you need a travel letter to travel.

And I didn't have a travel letter, and there's a real fear that I missed my flight, and I think before, maybe five years ago, I would have been really anxious, but I told myself, okay, if I get into the United States it's because someone wants me here, if I don't get in it's because the one that doesn't want me here. So I'm trusting the universe more, right?

One more different question. I don't know if you've moved out of China yet, but you had mentioned that once you do, you may be able to share more about what you're seeing in there. I don't know if you're able to share, you know, what you're seeing on the ground in China.

Yeah. I just think that the situation in China is hopeless because you have this leadership in place that is very arrogant, very indifferent and just very stubborn. And the people are so materialistic.

You know, you can't connect back to the monad if you don't actually believe in the monad, and I think that in the future, because of all these calamities, those who are spiritual in nature will be most able to survive the coming crisis. And the Chinese people are not at all spiritual. The Japanese are, but the Chinese are not.

Can I ask a question? First question, can you give us a book list? Not now, but maybe later. I tried to resist asking the question on Substack, but I know you have great books that you talked about, but can you give us a bigger, more comprehensive book list later?

Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I've taught the great books before. But I would say the most important thing is just to start reading books you enjoy reading. And that doesn't necessarily mean you have to read the great books, but it just means you have to get into the process of reading every day for an hour.

Yeah, I am doing that. But I still look forward to your book list.

I started the war on panoponia. That is a difficult word for me.

I mean, I highly recommend the Russian novelists.

So Tolstoy and Dostoevsky.

I have read some. Okay. Can I ask you another question? Can I...

You said that China is going to close up, repeat the history.

It's going to close its borders. Yeah. But what will happen to China after Xi? He's 74 years old, I believe. What will happen after him?

Because after Mao died, sorry, after Mao died things changed. So one strange thing that I don't think people appreciate is how long these guys can live for.

All right, like Trump is 80, right? And I was talking to some friends in Los Angeles and they're convinced he cannot finish his term, you know, he's going to die in office or he'll be forced to resign. And these guys, they're where they are because they have this steel determination. They love power. And so you put them in a position of power, they can live for a long, long time, right? So look at someone like Biden, I mean the guy was senile.

I mean the guy's brain did not function, but he was able to finish his term, right? I mean in the year 2020 we had a bet, is Biden able to finish his term given his medical ailments? And I think most people would be like, no, he won't be able to finish his term, and Harris will be the first, you know, female president of the United States. I think most people would say that, and people who knew his predicament would say that.

But he finished his term. So I think it's hard to appreciate how, once you're in that position, whether you're Putin or Xi or Trump, you never want to let go. You want to cling on until they snatch it from you.

But they will die eventually.

Says who? How do you know?

How do you know that they'll die?

Nobody has lived forever.

How do you know that? You mean the latest technology will make them live forever?

I think modern technology will surprise you. I think nowadays, with the idea of blood transfusion and organ transplants, and remember, they have access to the most advanced technology in the world.

Do you see any...

I didn't say they will never die, but I'm just saying we don't know when they will die. And I think they will live a lot longer than you assume they will live. Okay. But we'll continue. Yes.

You use the word monad and God a lot. What makes you believe in... do you believe in God, a God, or do you use God and monad interchangeably? And I guess what makes you...

Yeah. I mean, so for me, why I like the idea of the monad is it explains a lot of issues that I couldn't explain before. So for example, human consciousness is something that I could never explain before. Right? And I did a lot of research in neuroscience. I know about how memory forms and how the brain works and the synapses and all that, but it was never really fulfilling. It didn't really explain to me what was going on. And now the monad idea, that our consciousness is scattered across different dimensions and our ideas, our intuition, comes to us from the monad, I think that makes a lot more sense than the traditional neuroscience materialistic perspective.

Okay. So for me, it's just satisfying to think that there's a monad. And so I just went through life not being able to answer a lot of questions, and the monad helps me answer all the questions, and emotionally in my heart I believe it's right. Right. Because at the end of the day, you can only trust your heart. You can only trust yourself. And anyone who tells you not to trust yourself, trust the science, well, that person is probably Tony Fauci, right?

And you shouldn't trust the guy.

Yeah. Okay. Lots of questions at the back. Okay. We'll just pass it around.

Thank you, professor, for the lecture. So across multiple podcasts and in this lecture too, you kind of alluded to a Bronze Age type collapse in the next 50 years.

Yeah. And especially if reality plays out according to the model that you built out. You use the term Bronze Age collapse instead of something like, there have been great dips throughout history, like the Great Depression or after World War II. But you're comparing the next 50 years to the Bronze Age collapse that ushered in around half a millennium of dark ages. First of all, what's the probability in your honest opinion of that actually happening? And number two, what will actually happen that you compare it to the Bronze Age collapse and not to something like the Great Depression or after World War II?

Part 132:00:24

Yeah. So I think my logic is very simple. Right now there are 8 billion people in the world and these 8 billion people all want to live, right? They all want to survive. The problem is we are able to support 8 billion people because of access to cheap energy, mainly from the Middle East. Okay, if you remove the GCC from the equation, let's pretend the GCC doesn't even exist, well, you would lose access to fertilizer, not all fertilizer but a lot of fertilizer. You lose access to cheap energy, then there's a possibility of famine in Africa, of social revolution throughout Europe. Okay, so what people don't appreciate about the Bronze Age collapse is things were perfectly normal until they weren't. Okay, if you lived during the Bronze Age you would think, wow, we live in a perfect world, because everything is interconnected, and you assume that this leads to resilience.

It leads to dexterity, but it's the opposite. It actually leads to fragility. And so if there's one problem that arises somewhere, it cascades across the entire world. And look, again, I hate to say this, but you've got 8 billion people and their only resources are enough to support two billion people, and this includes water and food, right? So what are people going to do? You have kids and you're in Africa and there's not enough food and water. What do you do? Well, you migrate, right? You migrate.

You join bands of pirates, bandits, because that's the best way to survive. Then you become an army, right? Then you try to overwhelm the defense of Europe, which leads to wars. This is what happened during the Bronze Age. The migration is going to be a huge problem in this world over the next 10 years because there's not enough food to feed people. Famine is going to be a huge issue and this will lead to war. This is not World War II. This is a breakdown of... and you know, when this happens, when people don't have enough to eat, human decency goes out the window.

PredictionBronze Age-style collapse: migration and famine will become a huge problem in the next 10 years, leading to war and breakdown of civilization.Open

Okay? I don't care that you're a human being. You have food. You have water and I need it from you so I'm going to kill you. It's dog-eat-dog, right?

Do you think that's engineered too?

Excuse me.

Do you think that's engineered?

I think it's a path of least resistance, right? It's like, I don't want it to happen, but if it happens, I have a bunker in New Zealand. I have a helicopter that can transport me to somewhere else. I have this mansion in the Pacific Palisades and I can build a fortress. So it's a path of least resistance. I think these people in charge, the problem is not that they're evil, the problem is they're just...

Yeah. Yeah.

Do you have a vivid picture in your head of how this will look? Because I remember you talking about it in a podcast where you believe that in the next 50 years there will be two sects of humanity. One will believe in AI as a god and the other one will not reject AI as a god. Is that a part of your model of how this collapse will look, and also how would you survive in this world that you envision?

I think what's going to happen is just a process of constant change, constant revolution, the breakdown of social order. And I think that those who will thrive, or those who survive, are those who are deeply spiritual. Those who believe that they're connected to the monad and that they're here for a purpose, and their purpose is often to help others, and these people will become leaders, and then people will congregate towards these people and then the monad will show them the path forward. So I can't visualize for you what it will be like, because every year will be different.

I mean, imagine the amount of change we've had these past six months. It's been crazy, and so the pace of change, the acceleration, is just off the charts. So I can't tell you what the world will be like over the next 50 years, because every year will be different. But I can tell you to reclaim your spiritual heritage, to remember that you do come from a monad, that each of us comes from a monad, but most of us choose to forget that because it's just easier for us.

Thank you so much.

Hi professor. I'm just here to wonder, I'm asking if you've currently... the national draft. You've alluded to it many times. You talked about it a lot. I just don't see how it's feasible. I'm 22 years old. I was previously enlisted to go into the Marines before tearing my rotator cuff. I have a lot of friends that are actively in the military. You know, there was recently a news story where people are throwing themselves off of ships currently. I mean, I just don't see how it's feasible, how a draft could possibly happen.

Everybody my age is currently being propagandized to hate Israel, to hate America. How are they going to use us as a tool to work for them?

Okay, so I think a national draft doesn't necessarily mean going in the army. Okay, but imagine a scenario where, okay, you have economic collapse, the AI bubble collapses, the private credit bubble collapses, and a lot of wealth, okay, is just evaporated, right? So young people nowadays think that they have a cushion, which is their parents. Parents have a few million dollars in property and in the stock market, and they think, okay, well, worst case scenario my parents will bail me out. But let's imagine a scenario where the stock market collapses, the economy is in tatters, now people are desperate, now you have a Great Depression scenario, right? And what's the solution to the Great Depression? Basically a national draft, right? Basically jobs for everyone, and then sending everyone to World War II. And World War II happened because of 10 years of desperation, anxiety, people were happy to go to war, right?

On the same platforms that Zuckerberg owns, there's constantly reels being pushed. We're going to be used as drone bait. You know, I just don't see... I feel like everybody would rather go to jail than even serve in a nonviolent part of the military. But you're just saying because of that, you know, we're going to be desperate. We'll work for them anyways.

I think so. I think if there's a situation where you either work for the government in infrastructure spending, or in infrastructure building or whatever, you know, or be homeless, you would work for the government. And that's what I think the national draft is. The national draft should be a national works program.

My last question. 22 years old, I'm inspired by you. I would like to start a family. I see that it is, you know, the greatest means of purpose, but I'm concerned, right, if I get pulled away from, you know, the beginning of my family.

So, you know, I don't have a question, but...

You know what? That's a great question and I keep on saying this, but if you just do your purpose, the universe will pave the way for you. So 10 years ago I was unemployed, I had no real job prospects, but I fell in love with a woman, and as a manifestation, an expression of our love, we had children, and you know, this was a time when there was no way I could support a child. And after we had a child I wrote a book, and this book got me a job, and this job allowed me to put videos on YouTube, and each time we had a child it seemed like the universe smiled upon us even more.

Okay. So it's an act of faith. Having a family is an act of faith. And so if you just say, well, I mean, if I do a cost-benefit analysis, I should have a family, you get nowhere. But if you're like, you know what, if I have a family, if you do that, then what happens is, oh my god, now I must do what is necessary in order to raise a family. Then you manifest it and then your life becomes different.

Thank you.

All right. So what time is it?

Oh, it's 7:17.

Okay. So maybe in another 10 minutes I need you to ask me really quickly. Okay. All right. Sorry.

Let's continue. Yes.

Hi, Professor Jiang. I was just wondering, because you had said that your view of these secret societies is a nonlinear evolution. It's a broken chain for secret societies. Yeah.

They seem to share so many common interests since the Eleusinian mystery days up until now. Do you think that it could be the collective unconscious kind of working through people and wearing the face of these organizations to...

Get to some kind of goal, and with that, how do you reconcile negative forces like this in the collective unconscious with your beliefs regarding the monad being all good and whatnot?

Part 142:10:08

Yeah. Okay. So there are different theories out there, okay, and one theory is there are certain individuals whose spiritual practice is so great that they're able to transcend and they're able to embed themselves in the universal consciousness, and then these people are able to communicate with others and then they're able to incarnate and influence worldly affairs. Okay. And these people, in the past we've given names to them, like Satan or, you know, devils or Nephilim or whatever. Okay. So I think there's a lot of validity to this theory.

And the question then is, okay, how can we reconcile this with the monad, and what Dante would say is that if the monad truly loves us, the monad's gift to us is free will, so you can choose to do whatever you want. You can choose to create this world that we live in, which is very technologically advanced, materialistic, but which has led to tremendous human suffering. Okay, we choose to do this or we can choose to create another world.

Okay, but for the imagination to truly be effective, there has to be complete freedom. So I think that to say, you know, these people are evil and they are manipulating human events for the wrong things, that's not what the monad would say. The monad would say, if these people can choose to do these things, you can choose to do other things as well. And even though they seem to have all the power, your imagination is a true power. So if you have faith in your imagination, then that will be your light.

Okay.

And a follow-up question based on that imagination. What is your opinion on Plotinus's processions and eventually George Berkeley's view of idealism as a metaphysical framework of the world, and the projecting of the world rising from consciousness leading to matter rather than matter leading to consciousness?

I think that makes a lot more sense than matter leading to consciousness. Okay. I think the universe is consciousness and this material world is a simulation or a delusion that we've created for ourselves. That explains a lot more than the reverse. So for example, how do you explain consciousness, right? If you just use the emergent materialistic framework you cannot explain consciousness, and that's why they don't even bother trying to answer the question of where consciousness comes from.

Okay. Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. All right.

Hi, professor. Great to meet in person. Two questions. Number one, as a...

Could you ask just one, please?

Yeah. Sorry. Yeah, we're short on time. Yeah.

Okay. As a fellow teacher, what tips and pedagogical practices would you recommend to somebody who works at the middle school level? Yeah. Where they don't have as much of an excessive vocabulary as...

High school, and where you use narration, storytelling... what other techniques would you recommend where there may be language barriers? Okay. So I would say the three most powerful words you can ever utter as a teacher are "I am wrong."

Okay. If you do that every single day, I guarantee your students will be very different regardless of the age group or the language barrier. Okay? If you just say every day, if you just make a conscious effort to say, "I am wrong." Okay? What that does is it models self-reflection and humility and self-forgiveness in the student, you know, because if the teacher can say "I am wrong," that gives permission to the student to say, oh, I can be wrong as well, and I should just accept I can be wrong and then learn from my mistakes and improve, and that's the greatest gift you can ever give to your students.

Great. Thank you.

Okay. All right. Yeah. Yeah. Back there and then over here. You, over here. Okay.

Professor, can I ask a question?

Yeah, go ahead.

Okay. Thank you so much for everything that you do. Regarding the dollar, what are the few key consequential events that you foresee happening and what does the replacement look like?

The US dollar.

Yeah. So JD Vance has come out and said that he thinks the US dollar as the global reserve currency is a bad idea. And a lot of people are saying, well, I think they're trying to signal the US dollar is not going to be the global reserve currency anymore. And no one wants to be the global reserve currency because, as I pointed out before, it's a dumb thing to do. Why would you want to be the global reserve currency? You have no control over your currency.

It leads to financial speculation and then you have to invest a lot in the military, right? So no one wants to be the global reserve currency, and so I think by default there'll be a basket in place. Already you have these European banks saying, you know, we'll start using the Chinese be more. So I think the US dollar will still be around because it's a default option and there's no other alternative, and so it's not that the US dollar will be replaced, it's more like you have total global economic collapse, right? So the currency is no longer relevant because nations are no longer able to trade with each other.

PredictionThe US dollar will not be replaced but global economic collapse will make currencies irrelevant, with a basket by default.Open

So the plumbing will break and there will be fireworks.

I think we're heading towards a calamity beyond anyone's... I think if you just look at the progress of things these past 6 months, it's just astonishing. I mean, can you imagine six months before, we'd be in a room and saying how the United States is in a war against Iran? Even today we don't know why this war started and the United States has absolutely no strategy to win this war, but the United States refuses to withdraw from this war. It's the most silly thing ever.

PredictionWe are heading toward a calamity beyond anyone's imagination.Unresolvable

So I think the stupidity and the arrogance of the leaders today is just beyond anyone's imagination.

Okay. All right.

Hi professor. So again, I just want to tie into this individual's question in front of me, finding the source of wealth, right? There's the Bronze Age collapse analogy. My thing is, I'm learning about these AI data centers and the amount of water that they consume.

And so if we understand, you place a lot of emphasis on our wealth being imagination, and that's a major part of it, but I think in the physical world I feel like a lot of our wealth, and especially in a Bronze Age collapse scenario, would come from the land and the amount of crops that we were able to grow from the land and provide for those people around us, right? And so I mean, that's just my conspiracy theory, is they're consuming so much water to deny a level of wealth that the average individual could get from being able to produce the crops that they have, you know, for themselves.

So how much importance would you place on personal and familial gardening and plant cultivation as a way to survive what is coming?

So I think most people will die not because they lack access to food and water. I think it's just because they cannot accept that the world is collapsing around them. Okay? They're so focused, they're so pigheaded, they're so invested in the world that they refuse to accept change is possible. And you know, listen, if you just talk to ordinary middle class Americans, they're like, "Oh, well, you know, when Trump leaves office, things will go back to normal." They literally believe this, and well, how can you actually believe this?

But they literally believe this and so they choose to put their heads in the sand. So when that happens, they'll just break down mentally and then they'll just die.

Does that make sense? It's not a question of, you know, can you access food and water? Because if you want to, you can still access food and water. It's just that people would rather die than accept that they're wrong.

Yeah. And that'll be a lot of people.

This room is like this. We're trying to... This room is getting our head out of the sand.

Exactly. Exactly. You know, you've been awakened. You're out of the matrix now. Right.

Part 152:20:00

Right. Okay.

So sorry. Yeah. Up here. Yes.

Okay. Dante says free will is foundational. How does that influence your understanding of these personal tragedies you see in the news? For example, a mother with postpartum depression killing her children, or a kid that's been on SSRIs his whole life going crazy. How do we as a society come to a shared understanding about those things? What do we take away from that?

Yeah, that's a really good question. So again, we all come here for our own individual experience, and why we've come is something that is unique to us. And so for example, for most of my life I've struggled with why I had the childhood that I had, because you know, I grew up as a poor immigrant in Toronto where I suffered a lot of racism and bullying. My family was very, very poor. I mean they're still very, very poor, and I grew up in a culture, a Chinese culture, that I felt was very anti-intellectual, and for the longest time, for decades, I suffered from depression.

I felt traumatized because of my childhood in Toronto and my education at Yale. I just was very angry and depressed at the world. I was like, why am I here? What purpose does it serve anyone for me to suffer like this? There can't be a god, because no god would be this evil to make me suffer. I just felt like my life was just pointless and there was no god. There couldn't be a god because it was so chaotic. But now looking back at my life, I felt like the only path to my own personal enlightenment, my own personal salvation, was through this path. You know, if I really wanted to open my eyes and see the truth, I needed an intense period of personal suffering and personal questioning.

And there's really no other way, right? I mean, how am I able to be so creative? And I think that my creativity comes from these decades of personal trauma. And I'm not saying personal trauma leads to creativity. Okay? I'm not saying that. I'm not saying to traumatize your kids, man. Okay? I'm not saying that. But I'm saying we all came for a purpose and this purpose determines a lot of things that happen in our life. And you know, I think that I came with a specific purpose of trying to enlighten others, and that means first of all seeking self-enlightenment, and that can only be done through personal tragedy and personal trauma.

So I don't know why these things happen to people, but I would say if they look deep within themselves they will find a deeper meaning behind all these tragedies. I think a lot of people in this room, and I know certainly for myself, have gone through something traumatic that made them ask more questions about the world, and that's what opens them up to your ideas.

That's right.

So I don't know how to get through to people who haven't had that.

Like it's like talking to a robot. They They can't hear you out.

Well, I mean, you know, I've been a teacher for my entire adult life, and for the longest time I was not reaching people. People thought I was crazy. I mean, imagine, like, you know, 10 years ago, you watch my YouTube videos, you would think I'm insane, you know? But I kept on doing what I'm doing because for me, it's not about reaching others. It's about learning things for myself. Like I have this passion for truth seeking, for my own personal enlightenment.

And what others do and think doesn't really matter to me. But because I had this passion for truth seeking, that's allowed me to reach many people when the time is appropriate. So I would just say do what is right in your heart. And what is right in your heart is to pursue the truth. Because I could imagine myself working a job I didn't like, saying things that I didn't believe, even though that's what most people do. But that's why I've been poor my life, because I'd rather be poor than live the lie.

So a lot of things are just a personal choice, and what others choose I think is not really relevant. Okay. Sorry, so, but someone at the back.

Hello, professor. My name is Aldemar. I'm from Colombia. I live in a very poor neighborhood in Jackson Heights in Queens. And [clears throat] there are a lot of kids and youth. They don't have religion studies in their schools. Fathers, moms, they work two jobs, seven days a week. I'm dealing with something. I want to spread the word of faith and hope. But how do I overcome the fact that I feel judged by my religion, when my religion tells me that if you don't behave well, then you go to hell.

If you have to behave good in order to go to heaven. So my question would be, how do I overcome that bridge of me going to people and saying, hey, there is hope, there is love to share? I don't know if I make myself Yeah, I understand.

So I don't think it's important to convince others. I think it's just important to live the truth yourself, and then when you do that, what happens is others will naturally gravitate towards you, right? If that makes sense, right? So rather than trying to convince others, you just live the truth yourself, then others will come find you.

Thank you.

Thank you so much.

All right. Over here.

Hi, professor.

So we'll do three more questions, okay? Because the food's ready. Yeah. Knowing what you know about history and where the world seems to be

Has that changed The way you are raising your own child, what are the things that you are most intentional about as a parent?

Yeah, that's a great question. So, when I first had my child, he's outside eating right now and he just doesn't care. I thought I knew how to raise a child perfectly because, you know, I've been working in education for the past 20 years and I read a lot of books. I knew all about neuroscience. And then what I realized is the child is not yours. The child is from God, and you're blessed to be with a child, but the child has come with his or her own purpose.

His or her own telos, and he or she is going to seek a path that is right for him or her, and you can provide some support, but you cannot actually direct the child in the way that you want. And if you try to control the child, it's going to lead to a lot of unhappiness, because the child will be unhappy and the child will make you unhappy. So one thing that I've learned to do is basically trust the child and let him or her seek the path that he or she wants.

And so my child who's eight, he doesn't speak any English, because, well, I mean, he doesn't want to learn.

Right? I speak English. If he wanted to learn English, he would ask me, "Can you teach me English?" He's never done that. Right. So I've learned to let go and see each child as a child of God and not as my child.

Awesome. Thank you.

Okay. Any more questions at the back? Thank you.

Hi. Thank you for doing this. I just wanted to know, in your life, when you said there was, like, 10 years ago or so you had no job and whatnot. Did you, could you have a job that was comfortable and you decided to not take that route because it wasn't true to you? Basically, I'm trying to say, like, would you have settled for comfort had it been possible back then, or you kind of didn't want to in order to pursue your Yeah, that's a great question.

So, I'm very strange. All right. And I think that what makes me unique is all my entire life I've absolutely refused to compromise. Because, you know, I went to Yale. I'm [snorts] a very good writer. I'm a very good communicator, and I could have easily set up for a corporate job or done public relations. I mean, I could have also, in China, I could have also, like, helped students apply to Yale University, and that's very lucrative, but I just chose to live a life of poverty rather than compromise, rather than doing things I don't like.

Part 162:30:26

And a lot of the reason why is when I do things I don't like, I can't sleep. So the most miserable six months of my life was when I was working for the United Nations in Afghanistan. And if you ever worked for the United Nations, okay, it is like the best job possible. It is the easiest job possible because, like, no one actually does any work and you're there collecting a huge paycheck, and, you know, they give you this blue, and it feels really good. But I couldn't sleep, because I knew that what I was doing came at the cost of the local Afghan people, because the local Afghan people were, like, starving.

And I was making, like, you know, six figures a year, and I was having, like, you know, lunch at a restaurant that was five stars, and so I couldn't live for myself. I mean, I literally could not sleep the entire time. I was grinding my teeth. I had anxiety. So after that, I just learned, like, I'd rather suffer than betray myself. And I think that's actually true for everyone. It's just, like, maybe others have a higher tolerance than I do.

Could you sleep while suffering at that Excuse me.

Could you sleep when you were suffering?

I could not sleep. I could not sleep. I literally could not sleep. I just wrote in bed all the time and I hated myself. Like my entire body was shaking the entire time because I knew this was evil. Okay. The fact that you're in Afghanistan and, like, people here were starving, and, like, you were collecting, you know, this six figure, and also you were part of this evil occupation force, right? Because the Americans weren't there to help the Afghan people, they were there to do drug smuggling, drug smuggling. Like when the Americans went in, opium production went like that, okay? During the pine you didn't have any opium production, then the Americans came, and, like, they basically facilitated opium production so that the Sackler family could produce their fentanyl drugs, the opiates, which led to suicides, a suicide epidemic throughout the country.

Okay. So I knew this because you could see it, and so I couldn't sleep at all, and I was so relieved after I quit.

Thank you.

Yeah. Okay. One last question, guys. Okay. Over here. Okay. And that's it. But it's been great. Thank you so much for coming.

Good evening.

One last question. The last question. Okay. Yes. Go ahead.

Good evening, professor. So I had a friend who showed me your YouTube channel a few months back, and when I came across Plato's allegory of the, it was hell.

What kind of advice would you have for somebody going through that kind of realization that none of it's real? I would say that's what waking up looks like. You know, you go through hell, right? Because remember when Plato talks about the allegory of the cave, he's not like, you know, the guy walks into the light and he's like, happy, happy. No, no, he's going through hell.

I wept a lot.

You know what's happening, the occultist would say you're going through spiritual alchemy, but the neuroscientist would just say you're going through somatic reconnections, and it's a hellish process, like it's like your brain is just literally reconfiguring itself to reconceive the world in a new way, right? I mean, it is hellish and it is painful, but once you go through it you can never go back. Yeah.

Right. And then you're happier for it. And I think that's why a lot of people don't go through this process, because they know that to see things in this way, even though it's a truth, it means basically abandoning everything that you've known and embracing the unknown. And they don't want to go through this. And that's why I think we should be sympathetic or tolerant or respectful, right? And just say, like, you know, just because I went through it doesn't mean you have to go through it. But once you go through it, then you can never go back and you know how the world works.

So you know, this is just a phase, a stage in our lives, and we are eternal. Our souls are eternal, and when we come back at a later stage we will be much more enlightened. We will be much happier, and we won't have to go through the same process again.

Okay. All right.

Thank you.

Okay. So, thanks so much, guys. It's been wonderful. Thanks so much, Kathy.

Predictive History

An independent scorecard of every forward-looking claim Professor Jiang Xueqin made on the @PredictiveHistory YouTube channel. Not affiliated with the channel.

Updated 2026-10-16 · 757 calls from 180 transcripts.

About · Method · Contact · Videos · Data

How calls are found and checked

Each transcript was read in full by an AI model to pull out predictions, with the exact quote and timestamp. Each one was then checked with web search against events up to the update date, with sources linked.

How the hit rate works

Spot a mistake? Report it. Hit rate = (came true + ½ partly) ÷ resolved calls. Claims that were already underway when he made them are left out. Open calls haven't reached a verdict; Unresolvable ones are too vague ever to check. Verdicts are AI-assisted and may contain errors.