Global Meet-Up #5 (Toronto): Canada's Corporate Re-Structuring

My name is Kathy. I am the host of this event. Thank you guys all so much for coming. This is, I think, the first meetup in Canada, which is awesome because, you know, I'm from Toronto. Professor J's from Toronto. It's really nice to be back. And also before we begin, I just want to give a shout out to some people who helped me with this event. This is Tim. Tim hosts a podcast which we were actually just on, talking about biotechnology and geopolitics. And Tim helped me find the venue and is recording this.

And then I also want to give a shout out to my brother, who helped set up the whole event as well. And my friends Gerard and his friends with setting up the whiteboard and some of the food and snacks that you guys have had. And another really kind person who I met today, but I forgot his name. And he helped set up the sandwiches. If that's you, feel free to wave. And that's him. Yes. Thank you. So thank you, awesome. Well, without further ado, I'm going to give the stage to Professor Jiang and we'll start with the lecture.

Thank you so much.

I know he's a billionaire, but at least I'm not an antichrist. I hope. Okay. All right. So without further ado, we will do a lecture of about an hour, and I know we're in Canada, so we will talk about the US-Canada trade war and what will happen. Okay. So, as you know, the US-Canada trade talks have broken down and they are now refusing to negotiate with each other. And Trump is threatening to impose a lot of tariffs on Canada. Basically, prohibit Canada from exporting alcohol, steel, dairy products to the United States.

So that's the general theme of tonight's lecture. Where is Canada heading in the next 10, 20 years? Okay. So to establish this talk, I'm going to ask three questions or three paradoxes that have been troubling me for the past 5 years, because even though I've not been in Canada for the past 5 years, I've been observing just because I have family back here. Okay. So I have three questions that maybe you guys can help me answer, or answer together tonight. The first question is, why are there so many immigrants?

So just as a warning, I'm going to offend a lot of people tonight. I was in the United States. They're very rude down there. So I was probably infected with their rudeness. As some of you may know, I was also on a couple of comedy podcasts, Kurt Metzger and Sam Hyde, and they're very offensive. And so if I'm being offensive tonight, it's their fault. It's not my fault. Okay? Maybe a couple more weeks and my Canadian niceness will return to me. Okay? But the first question we have is, why do we have millions of immigrants coming into this country these past 5 to 10 years?

It's all very sudden right after COVID, and it's really causing a lot of friction within Canadian society. For example, it's almost impossible for a young person to afford a house. At the same time, the wages are being driven down, and you would think that because of all the friction being caused by mass immigration, they would put a moratorium on immigration. Instead, Mark Carney visits India. He visited India, I think last year, and he told the Indians, "Please send more. In fact, we'll give you scholarships to come here."

So that's just weird. Okay. Immigration is causing a lot of friction in Canadian society and you are encouraging more of it. So this is a paradox. Why? Why migration?

The second thing is, I remember growing up in Canada in the 80s and 90s. Canadians were known for their niceness, being polite, being nice, being very friendly. But I've been back in Toronto for about a day and a half and I take the subway and I walk around in order to get a sense of the milieu of this place. And I've been startled by a couple of incidents. For example, I got off a subway with my son and I saw a very angry young man get into an argument with an old man.

The man was probably in his 70s. The young man gets very upset and violently pushes the old man down against the wall. And I think that in the 80s and 90s that would never happen because it takes a lot for a young person to violently attack an old man who is basically defenseless. The old man took some time to get up and people were just walking past him, including myself. I didn't know what had happened. I didn't want to get involved. I walked past him.

But I'm pretty sure in the 80s and 90s there would have been people who went to help him get up or at least call the police. Okay, so that's one incident that I saw yesterday. Yesterday as well I was walking on Bloor and around Koreatown and I saw a huge argument between two people just walking around. I feel a sense of aggressiveness in this country that didn't really exist before. For example, in the 80s and 90s people would make sure to give each other space, right? To respect each other's space.

Now it seems as though there are certain individuals that are trying to provoke others by infringing on other people's space. Okay. So there's a certain meanness in this country that didn't really exist before. So that's the second paradox, which is how do you get nice people to become mean? What happened? Okay. And then the third paradox is why is Mark Carney prime minister? And you're like, well, duh. Well, we voted for him. Okay, but my question is why did you vote for him? Because again, I mean, I'm the furthest from a conspiracy theorist, as you know.

But I will say that there are certain things about the general election between Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre which basically confused me. So I mean Justin Trudeau was not a smart guy. Okay. He probably never had an original thought in his life. Someone was giving him these ideas, and it was probably not himself. It was probably Mark Carney, right? And I think it's pretty obvious that Mark Carney was a shadow leader of the Liberal Party. So if you're upset with Justin Trudeau because he was in power for 10 years, he screwed things up, why would you put his puppet master in charge?

Okay. And then the general election between Pierre Poilievre and Mark Carney was kind of strange because the conservatives had a huge lead and Poilievre, for whatever reason, decides to just implode. Okay, he basically doesn't even try. There's one line of attack that he could have used which he did not use during the general election, which is, "Hey, Mark Carney, you're a carpetbagger." Okay. Yes, you're a Canadian, but you spent most of your adult life either in New York or London working for Goldman Sachs or the Bank of England.

Most of your assets are foreign. Your family is overseas. You're a carpetbagger. You're not a true Canadian. A very simple, easy and effective attack. And we know this because previously there was a man, Michael, who was a Canadian but he was a Harvard professor. He came back, became leader of the Liberal Party, and he lost twice. Why? Because his opponent just said this guy's a carpetbagger. Yes, he's Canadian, but he spent all his adult life in the United States. He's come back in order to steal from us. Okay, so this attack is very effective.

For whatever reason, the Conservatives did not use it. All right, so we have these three paradoxes. Why is there so much immigration in Canada? How did Canadians turn from niceness to meanness? And the third is why do you guys elect Mark Carney? Okay. Why not elect change? Right? Okay. So the answer to all three questions is, and I know this is going to offend some of you, but Canada is not a real country. Canada is not a nation state. Canada is a corporation. Okay, that's my main argument to you today.

And this is what's leading to a lot of current trends. And once we understand this, then it will help us better understand future trends. Okay. The point of my teaching is not to make judgments. The point of my teaching is to provide deep analysis so that you can come to your own conclusions. Right? So that's my argument to you today. The solution to these three paradoxes is the fact that Canada is not a real nation state, a real country. It is just a corporation that is controlled by the City of London.

All right. So first, what many of you will ask, well, what then is a nation state? Historically, we've had three major examples of nation states. Okay? And they're all different examples. The first is France, which basically gave us a concept of a nation state. Second is Germany. The third is the United States. Okay, these are all three different conceptions of the nation state. All right, let's start with France. Okay, so if you know your history, France has something called a social contract. And this was a theory developed by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his book called The Social Contract, which is we're born free.

Our freedom is our most precious gift from God. We choose to surrender our freedom in order to work in society, in order to create a society. But in return for our freedom, we must be given... and this creates the idea of the... Okay? And even today, if you go to France, I'm not sure if any of you have lived in France, but they take this idea of citizenship very, very seriously. Okay? Okay. And it's created a lot of conflict in France because there are many Muslims who want to wear the hijab and the French are like, no, we are a secular nation state with a social contract.

We don't allow that. We're not religious. Okay. So, but what made the social contract possible was not a piece of paper. It was through blood. Specifically the French Revolution, right? And the Napoleonic Wars. That's what established France as a nation state, the sacrifice of the people in return for eternal and inalienable rights guaranteed by the state. Okay, that's the French model, a social contract brought about by a people's... Okay, and it's still in effect today. And as I said, the French are very proud of this achievement. Then you have, for Germany, it's iron and blood.

It is the language. It is the heritage, the culture that makes you German. Okay. And this is interesting. And this idea was proposed by Johann Fichte, who was considered the father of German nationalism. And at this time in history, and you guys don't really appreciate this, the Germans were not a united people. They didn't even speak the same language. And so it was up to philosophers like Johann Fichte to come up with a conception of Germanness. Okay. It was really the Prussians through their conquest that created the modern nation state of Germany, and people like Hitler would reinforce the German ethnic identity.

And the idea of German nationalism is you are born into this culture, this land, this language, this blood makes you who you are. Therefore, you might sacrifice everything in order to make the nation state great. Okay. So this is a very different conception of nationalism. And it's Germany. The last example of the nation state is the United States of America. Okay. US and the US have something called the... It is best to think of the constitution as a game. Okay, you come to the United States and as long as you have ambition, you can become rich and that is guaranteed to you by the constitution.

Okay, so for the United States, what matters is ambition. We don't care who you are. We don't care where you come from, but if you come here, you work hard, you're talented, you're ambitious, you will succeed. Okay? And that's the idea behind American nationalism. As you can see, all three are very different, but they all work. Okay? Why I say Canada is not a nation state is the Canadians, we don't have any of this history. Okay? So, for example, the French had a revolution. Canada never had a revolution.

And you guys may not know this, but Canada is not even owned by the government. It's owned by the crown. 89%. Okay? 89% of all Canadian land is owned by the crown. You're like, "Wait a minute. Who the hell is the crown?" Okay? It literally means the king of England. Okay? Literally the king of England owns 89% of all the land in Canada. Well, this is interesting. You go online, you ask ChatGPT, does the king of England own 89% of Canada? Because if he did, that would be a very strange thing.

And ChatGPT says yes, he does. But it's all just a fiction, guys. Okay? It's all just a... what the real power is, the government, both the federal and the provincial governments, and they are empowered by the people. Okay. So it's just a fiction that the king is in charge, for historical and heritage reasons, but in reality the people in Canada are in charge. So don't worry about this, guys. I'm telling you right now that's BS. Okay? The king of England is really in charge. And the example I use is World War II.

Okay, World War II. The Germans are kicking everyone's ass and the British are forced to retreat from Europe in a very embarrassing and humiliating defeat. Okay. And Winston Churchill gives a radio address before Parliament, before the English people, and he says, and it is one of the most famous speeches in the world, I've actually taught this speech, but he basically says, "We will never surrender. We will fight on the beaches." Okay, I'm sure you've all heard the speech. It's a very short speech. It's a very powerful speech, but there's an ending that you guys don't remember.

Okay, I'm sure you guys don't remember the ending, but the ending goes like this. We will never surrender. And providence, God is on our side. But if for whatever reason we lose Britain, it's okay. Why? Because we'll just go to Canada and we'll fight from there. And you guys understand this? Okay. The prime minister of England, Winston Churchill, says Canada is our territory. If we lose Britain, it's okay. We'll just all move over to Canada and fight from Canada. Right? So in the British imagination, Canada is just a resource colony of the British.

And legally speaking, it is true. Okay. The democracy here, the separation of powers, the sort of rights and freedom, it's all just an illusion to disguise the fact that Canada is a resource colony of Britain. And the reason why is Canadians never had a revolution. Okay? If you never had a revolution, then the people in charge are still in charge. It was the British who founded Canada through the Hudson's Bay Company and they're still in charge. Okay. So Canada is not a real nation state. Okay.

The Germans say nationalism is iron and blood. Well, first of all, Canada has two languages, which is confusing. But also Canadians haven't really fought a war of expansion. Okay? So Canadians don't have the mythology of, say, France, Germany and the United States. Okay, the mythology: the Americans have the American Revolution, George Washington crossing the Delaware. Okay, the Germans have Bismarck, France has Napoleon. Okay, so there's no mythology to unite the country. There's no sense of destiny.

And the United States has ambition, right? What are Canadians allergic to? What do Canadians really, really hate? Ambition, right? Okay. So you could also make the argument that not only is Canada not... Okay. But it is fundamentally antinationalistic, that Canada was designed in a way to ensure that nationalism could never, ever... in order for Britain to maintain control over Canada. All right. Okay. So Canada is not a nation state. So what does that mean? Well, for 50 years, oh, sorry, for 70 years after World War II, this was actually beneficial for Canada because it allowed Canada to navigate the relationship, the very complex relationship, between Britain and the United States.

Okay. So this is Britain far away and this is the US down south. This is... Okay. The nature of Canadian antinationalism allowed Canadians to basically live the easiest, happiest, best life of anyone in the world for the past 70 years. All right. The relationship with Britain allowed Canada to become what is often referred to as an offshore financial center. Okay, what is an offshore financial center? It just means money laundering. Okay, that's all it means. Money... You think that the Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Montreal, Bank of Nova Scotia, they make your money taking your deposits.

No, they don't do that. Okay, they don't need your money. What they really do is they do money laundering. Okay? They allow dirty money that was won from the drug trade and wars and arms smuggling and all that to be recycled back into Canada. Okay, that's a real function. So Britain allowed Canada to be an offshore financial center as well as a land of immigration.

Okay. And immigrants bring energy, wealth and ideas to Canada. The relationship with the United States was also really good because the United States was a growing manufacturing power and so Canada provided resources to the United States. All right, resources. So as you can see, for the past 70 years Canada did really well because there were three main sources of Canadian wealth. They were selling resources to the United States, and Canada has an infinite amount of... becoming an offshore financial center for Britain, for the state of London basically, and allowing immigration into Canada.

Okay. The nature of the Canadian basically then formed the structure of Canadian society. All right. Okay. So let me explain to you what the Canadian society structure looks like.

Okay. So, as I said, Canada's owned by the crown, but when we say crown, okay, we literally mean the king of England, but it's not really the king of England who's in charge. It's the City of London that's in... Why? Because historically it is the City of London which has lent money to the crown and therefore the City of London can dictate the policies of Britain. Okay? So when we say the crown, we actually mean the City of London. Now the City of London does not really care about everyday operations in Canada.

So instead there are these CEOs that are responsible for the everyday management of Canada and we call them the Laurentian elite. Okay, the Laurentian elite. And they're basically, you know, the prime ministers, the ministers. Okay. And a lot of this is hereditary. Okay. Justin Trudeau is part of the Laurentian elite. The people around him are part of the Laurentian elite. And it is best to think of them as pseudo-aristocrats. I would say pseudo-aristocrats. Okay. People who like to read Jane Austen, basically manor lords.

It's very easy to be part of the Laurentian elite. You don't have to do anything because the economy just functions by itself. Okay? You're at the crossroads of the British offshore financial center as well as the US manufacturing power. And so they don't have to do anything. Okay? And so they just live a life of leisure and aristocratic virtue, very much like Jane Austen if you read her novels. Okay? Their life is basically mirrored in the life in the novels of Jane Austen, and they aspire to that sort of life, a sort of pseudo-British aristocracy.

Okay. So around the Laurentian elite is the bureaucracy. Okay. The federal, basically the government that actually runs Canada. All right. And then around the bureaucracy are basically white Canadians, okay? Canadians who have been here for more than two, three generations. And what keeps this system going, okay, because quite honestly these guys don't really do any work, is immigration, continuous immigration.

Okay? And this structure allows Canadian society to function. But once you have the structure, it determines the very composition or nature of Canadian culture, and I would say there are three aspects to Canadian culture. Okay. Or the three most salient pillars of Canadian culture. The first I would say is following the rules.

Okay? Because remember, Canada is a corporation. It's a bureaucracy. So what's really important is just follow the rules. When you go to school, what are you taught? Follow the damn rules. Okay? All right? That's number one. Number two is be polite. Okay? So you think that being polite just means being nice. Actually, what being polite really, really means is respecting the social hierarchy. Okay? Okay, understanding your place in the social hierarchy and investing yourself in it. Which leads us to the third characteristic of Canada, which is mediocrity. Okay, mediocrity just means a lack of ambition.

Again, in Canada, the worst insult you can throw at someone is, this guy's ambitious. Okay, that's like saying this guy's a pedophile or something, right? So these are the three main characteristics of Canadian society. Everyone has to follow the rules. You have to be polite and you have to be conventional. You have to be mediocre. Being ambitious is wrong. And if you are too ambitious, then you should do everyone a favor, move to the United States, which is what I did and what Kathy did, right? So this is what has worked in Canada for the past 70 years.

And this helps us explain why Canadians are so nice, because the point in Canada is to maintain a status quo because the status quo works for everyone.

All right. So then the question is, right, so this is fine, right? So why would the system break down? Why are we seeing massive immigration? Why are Canadians being mean? Why is Mark Carney being prime minister and starting a trade war with Trump? And the answer is, and you guys will know the answer if you've watched my lectures, but the answer is elite overproduction. Okay, you've got too few pitches of power and you've got too much elite competing against each other. And to put this in very simple terms, what this means is right now, okay, the City of London is not doing well economically and so it needs to put more pressure on Canada in order to create more profit and more revenue.

Okay, before, the City of London was perfectly happy to get a certain return on investment. But as time passes, as the City of London faces pressure, financial pressure, it needs to exert more pressure on Canada to create more revenue. Okay. The problem with Canadians is they are too polite and they are too mediocre. So if you're a company, okay, you're the investor and you look at a company, you're like, wait a minute here, the middle management, if they're not actually working that hard, what do you do? You replace them.

Okay, we call this a corporate restructuring. That is literally what is happening in Canada today. Right before your eyes, there's a restructuring going on where the old Canadian guard is being replaced by immigrants. Okay, that's why they're doing this, to generate better return on investment in Canada. Canadians like the environment. Canadians care about family. Canadians care about being polite. We don't want that crap, okay? We just want a higher return on investment. Go and destroy the environment. Abandon your families. Okay? Stop being so nice. Start making more money for us.

Okay? This is why this is happening. Okay? And it's very clever what they're doing because Canadians can't respond because of the antinationalism that has been indoctrinated in the education system. Okay. Specifically this idea that's been very popular, which is this land in Canada does not belong to anyone except the native people. Right, on the plane from New York, from Boston to Toronto, I mean Air Canada, and for whatever reason it kind of puts on an ad saying thank you, this land is the original people's, we are grateful. Why are they doing that? It's to diminish or reduce resistance to this corporate restructuring.

If this land does not belong to Canadians, then it's probably fine to give it to the immigrants. Right? In fact, you have these court cases in BC where they're trying to take private property and return it to the indigenous people. Okay? Right? All right. So there's a corporate restructuring going on and there's really nothing the Canadians can do about it because of the antinationalism in this country. You can make the argument that antinationalism was part of the Canadian education system in order to make the restructuring fast and easy.

Okay. But then you're like, okay, if there's restructuring going on, who's coming in? Okay. And if you're the British people, if you're the City of London, you're an investor. Historically, you recognize that there are two groups of people that offer you the best return on investment. All right. Okay. So what we're seeing in Canada is an invasion. It's not really an invasion, but it's a restructuring of an alliance between Zionist capital and Hindu labor. Okay, this is why the vast majority of immigrants are Indians, and there is Zionist capital that's supporting this movement.

Okay, this is what the corporate restructuring looks like. All right. And then you ask yourself, wait a minute here, if it's clearly population replacement, why isn't the Laurentian elite opposing this, or why are they even supporting this? And the answer is because if you are the middle management, okay, you're just trying to keep your job for God's sake, okay? You just want to keep your job. So if you're like, you know what, if I go with a stupid restructuring, then maybe I can continue being a man of lords and an aristocrat and my children can continue to be so.

But no, no, no, that's not how restructuring works. Okay, in restructuring everyone goes, especially the old management. Okay. And eventually, maybe not now but eventually, the Laurentian elite, or certain factions of the elite, will recognize this, in which case what is their play? What is their strategy? It's to join the United States. Right.

Okay. So over the next 10 years, 10, 20 years, the conflict in Canada, where the Laurentian elite become much more clear about what's happening, that there's a restructuring going on and the City of London wants to replace everyone in order to make Canada more profitable for the City of London, there'll be certain factions of the Laurentian elite who are like, we're actually better off being with the Americans. Okay. So you think that what's happening is a trade war between Canada and the United States, between Mark Carney and Donald Trump.

No. Okay. Mark Carney, his boss is not the Canadian people, he works for the City of London. All right. And if you don't believe me, consider what's happening in Argentina, where Trump has come out and said that Argentina should reclaim the Falkland Islands. Why is he doing that? Do you guys have you seen the map? Argentina is in the middle of nowhere, man. It's far away. Who cares about these stupid islands? Trump is doing this in order to enforce the Monroe Doctrine, or the Trump corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, which is like the entire Western Hemisphere is the United States', guys, London get out of here.

All right. So the first major limit test is what happens with the Falkland Islands, because Argentina wants to reclaim the Falkland Islands. Trump will help Argentina do so and we will try to see Britain's response. Okay. How will the City of London respond? The second big limits test is Alberta. Okay. If all my predictions, all my analysis, is correct, what will happen is this. The people in Alberta will vote to secede from the Confederation. Okay? And then this will go to the Canadian Supreme Court. And the Canadian Supreme Court will then tell the reality to everyone, which is, guys, you think Canada is a democracy.

You think the people are sovereign? No, that's not true. Okay, actually everything belongs to the crown. Therefore, Alberta, you can't secede. Okay, this is... Why do you think you have sovereignty? The crown owns all the land. You cannot secede. Okay. And this is going to cause Trump to intervene and say maybe I'll send a peacekeeping force to Alberta in order to make sure there's freedom of democracy in Alberta. Okay. So if my analysis is correct, there will be, in the next two years, two major points of friction.

The first is the Falkland Islands. The second will be Alberta. Okay. And Alberta will be the major test of whether my analysis is correct or not. I think what will happen is that the people of Alberta will choose to become independent. Okay, they won't join the United States because they cannot, but they can choose to become independent. This referendum will pass but then it will go to the Canadian Supreme Court, who will rule, for I don't know what reason they will say, but they will rule this referendum is not constitutional.

It is unconstitutional. Alberta cannot secede. This will draw Trump into the conflict. Okay. So that's what I think will happen long term. It is very hard for Canada to maintain its current way of life. Okay. You either have this massive restructuring where Zionist capital and Hindu labor become the new elite, where it's basically population replacement. Okay, to put it in very simple, stark terms, it is population replacement, or you could have Canada divide up into different provinces. If Alberta goes, the western provinces will go as well, then Quebec will go, then the Maritimes will go and the only place left will be Ontario.

Okay, Ontario will become Canada. But the question then is, well, Ontario by itself, is it really a sustainable, self-sufficient economy? And the answer is no, it's not. Okay, so I would say that is the stark choice Canada is facing. I will also say both will probably happen. Okay, you will have population replacement and you will also have the provinces break up, and some like Alberta will choose to join the United States, some will become independent, and maybe Ontario will be the last province standing in Canada. Okay. All right. So I know this was a lot to take in, but are there any questions about this?

Okay. So here's what we'll do. Okay. Maybe Tim can come and moderate, but we'll first discuss this general thesis. Okay. And then after that we will open up to more general questions. Okay. But first let's focus our discussion on this topic because we're in Canada and this is most pertinent to your lives and your future. Okay. So Tim will moderate, Tim will pick the speaker, and then we'll have a discussion. Okay.

So you just mentioned that there's a possibility of Canada splitting up at the end, in the long term, but all the land belongs to the crown. But then the Canadian people are not, like, you know, they're not going to revolt against the crown. So there's no revolution. How are they able to split up if everything belongs to the crown legally? Okay, so that's a really good question. And so what we need to appreciate is that Canada is a series of fictions.

Okay. And these fictions can be contradictory. Okay. So one fiction is the crown controls all Canada. But it's a fiction because unless you have the military to enforce your claim, then it's just a fiction, right? And that's what Trump is saying. Trump is saying, "Well, technically, yes, the crown controls 89% of Canada, but we are the United States and the Western Hemisphere is ours because of the Monroe Doctrine. So what's going to happen is if we roll our tanks into Toronto, is Britain going to send their 5,000 troops over to protect Toronto?" Probably not.

Okay. So the idea that the crown controls 89% of Canada, it's just a fiction. All right. The idea that Canada is a democracy, that's also a fiction. So there are different fictions in place. And what Trump is doing, but not just Trump, but also Putin, what they're doing is just saying, well, let's test these fictions and... Okay. Does that make sense? All right. Okay. Anybody have a related question before we move to other topics? Yeah. Right here.

They would say, "I'm stupid." But most would just tune out. It'd be kind of dissonance. They would just not do anything and they would walk out and they would forget everything. Okay. So Canada is in a state of self-denial. And the problems in this country, no one talks about. I mean, no one ever talks about COVID and what happened with COVID. No one ever talks about the fact that Mark Carney was able to be anointed as prime minister. It was not a real leadership race from the Liberals.

No one talks about this stuff. Okay. So there's no strategy in this country. Okay. These people in charge, the Laurentian elite, they're just basically like feudal manor lords who are interested in raising sheep. That's about it. Yes.

And there are a lot of immigrants coming into this country and they're tough people, meaning they have lived through the worst lives. They've lived through famine, they've lived through violence, gang warfare, all that. So Canadians don't really know what's coming. But the Canadian economy is in deep, deep trouble because, as I mentioned, there are three pillars to the Canadian economy. There is the offshore financial center, the money laundering, immigration and the resources. Well, because of the trade war the economy is going to be screwed. Okay. So I don't know why people think Mark is a genius.

Look, the United States is the buyer. Canada is a seller. You don't piss off your customer. Okay? You don't do that. So Trump knows he has all the cards and you will have a massive recession in Canada very, very soon. And there's no hope because this is not a trade war. Okay? This is a fundamental conflict between the United States and the City of London. The United States will win this war, and the United States will win this war by inflicting as much pain as possible on the economy, which will then provoke people in Alberta to vote for independence, and it will cause a lot of pain in Canada.

So a lot of people will want the United States to invade. Look, I was on the Kurt Metzger show, the boys. I was joking about this, how, you know, the United States should stop attacking Iran and start attacking Canada. Okay. And there were opinions in the comment section like, we welcome this. Thank you very much. Okay. Because they understand that what's really going on is population replacement and maybe Trump can save them from what's going on. Okay. So I would say the next 5 to 10 years will be pretty bad.

All right. Let's go front over here.

Now since ambition would rise here in Canada, is there the slightest possibility that Canada might actually become the next US, and the US is declining as per your other theories?

Okay. Okay. So I spend some pawn be analysis. All right. So Britain and Canada are not the same place. Britain is a nation state. People in Britain have a heritage. They have a language. They have a culture that they're very proud of. And this Islamification of Britain is causing a lot of social profit because of that. You have lots of people who are setting up, and quite honestly I think Britain is very, very close to civil war and in fact I mean it's almost at the tipping point. What you need to appreciate is the City of London and Britain are not the same thing. The City of London is the center of transnational capital. All the City of London is interested in is trying to create as much return on investment for the investors as possible. Okay. Britain is actually a nation state. So London is a for her sight on Britain.

It's possible for the civil lender to move anywhere around the world if they need to. Okay. So Canada and Britain are not the same thing. You don't have the resistance to immigration that you had in Britain. Okay. But now you ask the question, okay, but now you bring in Zionist capital and Hindu labor. And so theoretically, wouldn't that make Canada in the future a superpower? Okay, there's something called the Century Initiative where by the end of the century they're hoping for 100 million Canadians, and it's all part of the idea that Canada can, because of its resources, because of its size, become a superpower as well.

And the answer is no. Okay, so let me explain why. If you're the City of London, Canada for you is almost the ideal place to corporately restructure because of the people. The people will not resist you. Therefore, you can find the ideal combination in order to restructure the society in order to generate the most return on investment for you. Okay. So there is Zionist capital and Hindu labor.

All right. So first let me explain Hindu labor. Basically it's easy to understand. India is one of the fastest growing populations in the world. That's a problem. You have too many young people in India and you let them sit in the country, eventually they will revolt. Okay. And this is already happening in India. If you've been following the news there's something called a todd revolution in India. Basically young people protesting against the corruption in the school system. Right. So your only solution long term is to export your people overseas, and we're already seeing that to Canada, but you need to export even more to Canada.

Okay. Now, Zionism controls capital and what's really interesting about Hindu labor and Zionist capital is it's actually a pretty good combination. Okay? Because Zionism, look, to put it in very simple terms, Zionism is about racial supremacy. All right? They don't say this, but if you actually look at what they do and you look at their belief system, it's about supremacy where the Zionists, the Jews, are at the very top, and everyone else is basically a servant. But you enjoy being a servant because they'll treat you well. Okay.

All right? So you can imagine a relationship where Zionism marries into a Brahmin class and then they're able to control Hindu labor, right? Pretty simple, pretty relationship. In fact, what's really interesting is that India is one of only four countries in the world where Israel has a net favorability rating. I was in Austin and an Indian American told me he went back to India and he was asking people where they were planning to immigrate and a lot of them say we're going to immigrate to Israel. Okay. Okay. So this is the combination that the City of London wants, not just in Canada but also Australia, Ukraine, Argentina, other places as well, because for them it's the best return on investment.

Okay. Because Indians and Jews are pretty hardworking and they're really talented. So it makes a lot of sense, but you're like, okay, what's the possibility of them making Canada supreme? None. Okay, why? Because the Hindus and the Zionists also practice their own racial supremacy. So Zionism is loyal to Israel and Hindu labor is loyal to India. Okay. So rather than becoming a resource colony for Britain, what will happen in the future is that Canada becomes a resource colony for India and Israel. But it's the same thing. Okay, Canada is our resources to be extracted.

Okay, but this is only assuming the United States goes along with this plan, and the United States will not go along with this. So the United States would rather Canada break up into different provinces and divide and rule Canada. All right. Yeah. Snoop over here and popped up first, just over here. I'll come back to...

So I studied in the US. So I went to CMU for my undergrad and I was at Northeastern for my grad school and I was a senior AI engineer at Amazon. I applied to the immigration system of Canada for 8 years. I was on the wait list and I had the minimal points because I was not married. So I didn't have kids. I didn't speak French. So I did the English language test and I got a perfect score because I'm from the UK. I grew up there. So those still didn't give me any points.

But I had a lot of friends from my sort of circles of the similar profile. None of them got into the Canadian system. But the people that actually got into the system were a lot of people from India that are from the lower castes, not Hindus, didn't have an education, and most of them when they come here they do odd jobs. They drive trucks, they do grocery stores and everything. So, and I wanted to come here as a senior AI engineer and I was very ambitious.

I ended up getting my green card in the US first. So I kind of pushed back on the ambition because I don't think Canada is looking to attract the top tier talent which maybe Israel would like. So I'm not sure what the overall thesis is. I do fundamentally agree with the Indian labor theory, and the cockroach party and all of the stuff, but I don't understand why I would not be allowed into the system whereas people much less qualified get here with all the perks and also put pressure on their housing system and stuff because they bring families and the extended relatives and so on.

So I don't know your thoughts on...

They're here as students. Okay, but then you ask yourself, okay, how can Canada make them go home? And the answer is you cannot. Okay, if tomorrow Carney says we are going to make every Canadian go home, you can't prove it. That they will apply for refugee status. They'll pull up the court system and they will continue to just be here. All right. So I'm not saying this is what they want to happen. I'm saying this is what's going to happen over the next 10, 20 years because of the particular pressure and friction within the Canadian economy.

Okay. Does that make sense? Okay. All right. Yeah.

So I love that you talk about the different layers of the narrative, but I think if we can go a level deeper into the narrative and what's coming, would you agree that what we need to do is to build cells of resilience? Yes, all these noise things are happening, but shouldn't we put our focus and attention into building cells of resilience that would have the resources and the support system and the community support to withstand what's coming?

But the other thing is also forgiveness, to forgive other people's mistakes. And so any community should be based on these two basic principles, and if they do these two basic principles the community really becomes resilient, is able to survive heavy calamity that goes off. Okay. All right. Thank you. All right. Okay guys, let's stick to Canada and then we'll roll it up later. Okay.

So do you still think that Trump would come and go for the third term, and if Trump would not be there, will the consequence of what you said about Canada remain the same, or...

Okay. Now, before you had empire by consent, now you are an empire by force. Okay. The problem is a transition because most people don't want to be... Okay? Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, yeah, they're politicians and they're very ambitious, but they don't want to be perceived as... They care about the legacy. Okay? There's only one person in the US political system that will be an... and is proud to be an... and that's Donald Trump. Okay, so I think this helps us understand why he's in power, because remember in 2020 the entire elite, the entire American elite, coalesced against Trump.

$6 billion was spent on defeating this guy in 2020 and bringing Joe Biden to power. What happens then? What happens afterwards? Putin comes and invades Ukraine and embarrasses the American Empire, and Biden was too weak to resist Putin. Okay. So in 2024 the empire is basically, we need somebody to be the scapegoat.

The scapegoat just means we know the empire is collapsing. So let's get someone to be the scapegoat so everyone blames this guy. We also want to maintain our empire. That means being an... to Canada, to Europe, to Japan. And so we need someone who's willing to do all this. And that person is Donald Trump, right? And not only that, but this transition might kick some high. And so in campus in the second term, we can't trust Democrats to come in and follow through on a lot of his policies.

So we might have to give him a third term. Also, what's amazing to us about Schwah is he's unique in American politics and he's able to capture the entire attention, consciousness, of the global public. It's really strange. Go back to the United States invading Iraq and there are huge protests around the world saying it's a war for oil. Okay. No one's like, George W. Bush is a... They're all like, no, it's all for oil. Fast forward to today, Donald Trump invades Iran. No one's like, this war's for oil.

Everyone's like, this guy's a... That's really strange. Okay. But if you're part of the elite empire, this is really useful. Okay. Who else can you get to do all this evil crap? And they get all the blame for it. Okay. So I think Donald Trump will get a third term because for the empire, he is indispensable. Okay. All right. Somebody here.

So while Downing Street is fighting the White House, presumably with the...

He works for the City of London. Okay. So for him as a banker, it's like how do I make the best deal for my... Okay. So in other words, Mark Carney at a very critical point will eventually sell Canada.

Yeah. Professor Jiang, thank you for what you do. Right. So just an observation now. Considering how you've set up the power structure in Canada, do you think that explains the reaction of the elite towards the trucker convoy back in 2022?

Okay? Right? If it's a true democracy, then the voters would not be afraid to overturn the government. And Canadian voters are very unique. I mean, I don't understand why people voted for Mark Carney. And the idea that, oh, Mark Carney will stand up against Trump, that's... Okay. So I think that the voters are conscious of the system. They play along in order to maintain the privileges. Okay. All right. Yeah.

Maybe he's interested in the freshwater of Canada. He's trying to kind of set that all up. I'm just wondering, could you speak more about the fertilizer situation and how that's going to play, and also maybe if you can go into Mark Carney, how he kind of got conservatives to cross the line. Right. So I hope you can get into all that. Thank you again.

It leads to complacency in society. Okay. So we see this all the time in Africa, a place like Nigeria, which is extremely wealthy with resources but it's always been corrupt. Canada is not as corrupt. Canada is one of the least corrupt countries in the world, but people here are complacent. People here are not going to work very hard. One thing that we need to factor in is the mood and the energy of the people, where in theory if Canadians got together, worked really hard with its resources, Canada would have a great future, but often in times of decline, you have exhaustion.

You have people who are just lazy and want to do as little work as possible in order to get by. Okay? Okay. And that's why this population replacement is happening, right? Because if Canadian people were like, you know what, things are not as good as they used to be, so let's work harder because we're the war in the world and if we send together, we'll, you know, be better off, right? Instead, the attitude seems to be like, whatever. Okay. In which case, this is forcing the restructuring of Canada. This is forcing the population replacement because again the City of London wants return on investment.

Okay. All right.

And the answer in Canada is often no, I can't buy a house, or I will suffer if I buy a house. So my honest advice is to look for a place where you can afford a house, because often a place where you can afford a house is a place in which they're family-friendly. They're growing. They welcome families because they want to grow the population and they want to grow the economy. A place like that is Austin, Texas. So I'm not sure if you've ever been to Texas, Dallas, Houston, Austin, but you can still buy a very large house, a four-bedroom for maybe half a million at a 30-year fixed rate mortgage.

That's really good. Okay. I think they have that in order to entice young people to go. So ask yourself, you know, not where you'd rather be, but ask yourself where I will be welcome. And that's actually more important. Where they value my contribution, where I can be part of a growing community. And Toronto is definitely not welcoming.

Yeah, so it's interesting because the United States is in imperial decline, and when an empire declines it causes all sorts of havoc to itself as well as to the world. So an empire in decline tends to be overaggressive and it overextends itself and engages in wars or conquest throughout the world. That's why he wants Canada. That's why they want Cuba. That's why he invaded Venezuela. But also an empire in decline tends to rupture internally. That's why it's very likely in the next 10 years there will be a civil war of some sort in the United States.

And the civil war will be a long-term thing where the states are in defiance of the federal government. Okay? So maybe Trump has a third term. In response, New York, California, Massachusetts, these very liberal Democratic states, are openly defying Trump. And this could lead to conflicts between federal law enforcement, ICE basically, and local law enforcement. And I think this will be a very long-term thing. So it's a very strange thing where within the United States there's civil conflict and the civil conflict is externalized by going and conflicting with other places.

So with the civil war in the United States, the Americans are much more likely to come into Canada, okay, in order to resolve their internal disputes. Okay.

Okay. Does that make sense? Okay. Thank you.

Because they're trying to generate as much return on investment as possible for their investors. Is that going to work? Because what people don't appreciate is that global trade, global finance, is predicated on the United States being able to guarantee world peace, right? And so you're China and you're like, you know, if I put in a trillion dollars in Canadian real estate, how can I make sure this is safe for... Okay, because again, remember before it was the United States which guaranteed that people could trade peacefully. But now the United States is going into decline.

The United States is very aggressive, especially towards China. If the Chinese is certain that they put this investment into Canada, they will be able to maintain it. Okay. So basically, another way of saying this, and it's hard for us to appreciate, is all the traditional paradigms that we grew up with are collapsing right before us. Okay? All these fictions that we believed in are collapsing before us. If you have $5 million in the bank. Okay. You think that, oh, this money is mine and I can at any point take it out.

Don't go try it. You can't do it. Okay. You go to the bank and you're like, I want $500 committed in my bank, I want to take it out. They're like, sorry, we can't do that. You're like, how much can I take out? Maybe $10,000. Try it. Okay. Try going to the bank and try to get all your money. It's a fiction. Okay, that money you think is yours. It's not yours. It's just a number they made up. Okay. So all these fictions that we believed in are collapsing right before our eyes.

Okay. Yes.

Problem though is, okay, over time these peasants are really hardworking and they set up a lot of grain. Okay, they have a granary. And then the children are like, "Well, I could go work for the landlord and grow crops, but my parents have a granary, so why don't I just, you know, not work?" Okay? And that's still Canada today. So if you're a landlord, you're like, "Screw this, man. This sucks." So what do I do? Well, what I do is I burn down the granary, okay? And I bring in new peasants who have no grain, and so they're forced to work really hard, right?

That's what's happening in Canada today, right? So not only will you have population replacement, corporate restructuring, but you will also see, in the next about 10 years, a financial collapse. All right? Because you have to burn down the granary in order to make the country much more productive. Okay. So your parents, these baby boomers who think they had like a million dollars in the stock market, $2 million in housing, and so they're good. No, no, no. Wait five years. Okay. I guarantee you there's going to be a great financial collapse in order to reset the economy.

Okay. The great reset. All right. Okay.

And so my best advice is, and I keep on saying this, but it's very important, to start focusing on spirituality, on community, and on family. Okay? And so if you just shift your focus from one of material acquisition to one of enjoying your time, the time of your family, then you'll be much more resilient. Okay. All right.

Okay? And really, look, I know there's a lot of hype around AI and robotics, but the people in charge don't think in those terms. They just think about how to control the population and how to better exploit the population. Okay. All right. Who's next?

Not really. Okay. Right. Yep.

And then Carney obviously had that famous speech regarding middle powers, which then also kind of leads to the theory that there might be some sort of tie-up there in the future with the Europeans to combat what's happening with the United States. So just curious to see if you think those alternate realities are possible versus the Yeah.

I'm like, why do I want to absorb this crap? I want Alberta because Alberta has the energy, right? It has the tar sands. That makes sense. But why do I want Ontario? Why do I want Saskatchewan? What good do these places do me, right? I'm better off just taking Alberta and then letting the rest of the country burn down, because once you lose Alberta, you lose the main source of revenue for the country. You lose government subsidies. The health care system goes bankrupt. The pension system goes bankrupt. You have riots on the street and then the Canadians begging you to come and save them.

But then I can choose where to go. Right? So that makes absolutely no sense for me to take over all of Canada. I'm better off just Balkanizing Canada and taking the part I want. Right? Now then you're like, "Okay, well then what if Canada joins the EU?" Do you know how incredibly incompetent the EU is? Like, have you seen this war in Ukraine? It's a disaster. It's a trust guy. I mean, the European leaders are even more idiotic than Mark Carney. Like the British leaders, Macron, you have Merz. They're just the most unprofit people that ever existed.

What good would it do Canada to join the EU? Also, you know how far Europe is from Canada? Okay, we can drive to the United States. Europe is at least 7 hours away by flight. Okay, the Atlantic Ocean is pretty big. Makes no sense for Canada to join the EU. And again, look, Canada's a resource economy. It sells resources. The United States is a manufacturing power. It wants resources. Europe is a dying museum. It doesn't need the resources. Okay. So I mean, it's completely unrealistic. Yeah. Go ahead.

What happens to their, would someone else come and continue driving the defense strategy that they've outlined to go all the way to the Yeah.

But if you remove Trump, then people will be much more able to analyze the structural forces at work. Okay.

So the restructuring happens regardless of whether the United States is in power or London is in power.

Okay? So they control mines, they control forestry, they control water rights. Okay? And so as a corporation, you make money when the nation is productive. When we mean productive, we just mean they're energetic. They work really hard. Okay? And these companies are global. They're everywhere. Okay? They're in Australia. They're in South America, the United States. Companies like Rio Tinto, right? Rio Tinto, a major mining conglomerate. What I'm saying is the entire Western world has declined. Okay? Why? Because the people are not as hardworking as they used to be. They're very And so for you, if the company's not doing well, what do you do?

Well, you restructure the management in order to make the workers work harder. Okay. So another way of saying this is, okay, in Canada the average Canadian is like, you know what, I'm good with making enough to get by. I'm more focused on my family. I want to enjoy my weekends and my cottage. I want my two vacations a year. Okay, that's a Canadian attitude. Whereas maybe if you are Indian, okay, and you are poor, you come here and you're like, you know what, I need to bust my ass in order to stay in this country.

The Canadian has more money, but the Indian will be more energetic. He'll do more labor, and as a capitalist, I extract value from the energy and not the capital. Okay. All... Yes.

Hi, Professor Jiang. Two questions, a macro and a micro. The macro one: if you're Laurentian elite, applying game theory, you see yourself being replaced, doesn't it make strategic sense that you cut yourself a deal with the US and sell your country to the US? I mean, I'm sure they know that the US can take over Canada and, you know, you'll be out of a job anyway.

So why don't you sell Canada to the US and manage to hold on to power still, agree to manage Canada?

There's a restructuring going on. They're just trying to do the best job they can and have the biggest return on investment where they can. What I'm saying is that over time they will behave like this. Okay. So number one is a lot of these things are thisful to people. Number two is it is easier to practice self-denial than just seeing things clearly. Okay? Because obviously if you are in charge of the Laurentian elites, you see things so clearly that it can only lead to dismay, and these people don't want to feel bad about themselves.

Okay? So these things happen and no one can stop them because the people in charge practice self-denial. Okay? They are delusional. They live in their own bubble which reinforces their own prejudices. All right. Yes.

Another 10 billion electrification program into the east, another 10 billion for the icebreaker fleet. And of course, we've heard about the submarine fleet. These domestic programs where billions are being poured in, and their corresponding supply chains, as an FDR-like New Deal response that could help, you know, this does seem to be kind of in line with trying to help stimulate and protect the economy from that, and of course the trade deals internationally as well.

There's just actually no way someone with an independent streak would be allowed into that position. And you could argue, well, you know, maybe he'll have a change of heart, right? And the reality is there's nothing about his character that suggests that he cares about anything except his own status, his own power. Look, guys, look at the picture of Mark Carney. The guy's like a classic Hollywood villain. Okay, he's a cross between Emperor Palpatine and Voldemort. Okay, whose face is not lie. He is pure evil.

He is pure opportunism. If you just look at his face, man. Okay, I mean, Mark Carney would never ever have gotten elected in the United States. Okay, wherever you have democracy, there's no way the people would have put together, got in power.

Because I think these are all, it's very important analysis, but I find it's distracting us from the real threat.

Why is it that everyone believes that we're moving towards a one world government? And I think a lot of it is just intuition about how the elite operate and how the elite think. Okay, if you go to a World Economic Forum, you hear our carative speeches, if you see how these people talk, they are at the back of their mind thinking of a one world government. Okay. But what's really important for us to understand is why would they think in those terms? Why do they want a one world government?

And the answer is, and this answer is going to surprise you guys. Okay. But what I believe is that as you climb in the power hierarchy, as you become more and more powerful, as you absorb more and more wealth, okay, you become a billionaire or trillionaire, the way that your mind operates changes. Okay? So for example, using an average person, you see the world in terms of other human beings. Okay? But at that level you are removed from humanity. We see humans as more thoughts on a screen or life on a blueprint.

Okay? You stop seeing things from a human lens. You start seeing things from a systems or structural lens. You basically see the world as a blueprint. Okay? And so what happens is your mind becomes focused on creating a one world government. Okay? Because then it's easier for you to manage society and it's only a small group of people anyway. Okay. But there's a problem or weakness to this style of thinking, which is as your power your imagination Okay. So there's this inverse relationship between power and imagination.

The more your power increases, the more your imagination decreases, which means that you develop hubris. You are not capable of understanding your own limitations. You're not capable of appreciating you could fail. Okay. In which case you can't actually succeed. So it's a very strange dynamic where never before in human history have so few people accumulated so much wealth and power for themselves. But because they've done so it creates hubris, and the hubris will ultimately lead to their downfall. Okay. So another way of figuring this is maybe thinking of this as the Okay.

So the one world government is their version of the power of vapa, and we know how double turned out. Okay. Yeah. So I'm just trying to have a little bit more clarity in my mind. Let's imagine what you say in terms of Canada happens. The country breaks up, and then I think you spoke to it when you were in Austin that Trump would give it to his friends and powerful people and such, you know, if the US were to absorb it. I'm just trying to understand because you tend to ground a lot of your examples with historical precedent or at least stories and mythologies.

That's the one that I haven't really been able to understand, because for example this one, my mind immediately went to Vietnam as far as the hubris of the US. They had all the power but they weren't able to defeat the Vietnamese and they were defeated themselves. What would it look like in your estimation if the US is able to absorb Canada, and what does life look like on the ground in that reality? That's my Okay.

The number of people that the Americans killed in Vietnam was just tremendous. Okay. The Americans tried almost everything except nuclear bombs against Vietnam and the Vietnamese refused to surrender. The Canadians aren't like this. Okay. Next, I have a question. It's not related to Canada, but one of the driving forces that you've talked about, which is the rise of Israel and India, and the fact that the people that drive change the most are usually the most extreme or the most eschatological. So there's an eschatology in Hinduism which is we're in the Kali Yuga, and this is the age of darkness where even though we don't see the physical manifestation of demons and angels, every human is basically fighting this war within themselves.

So it's the demonic powers versus the good, the angels, trying to fight over what we do and our actions. And so we truly don't define, like Trump or like Carney, like you said, is the epitome of evil. If this fight, and also I think Jewish eschatology is like there's a war of Gog and the Gog, eventually good will prevail. So is that what you see as well in this one world government, like essentially the people in charge will have good forces or good thoughts to change or lose their evil sort of Okay.

And what kind of society, what kind of age are we in when it's so obvious what happened and, you know, it's unbelievable that this was able to happen, and then society is not able to come to a clear moral understanding or verdict. So I think we are definitely in the Kali Yuga. I'm not making a judgment about what happened. Okay.

The breakdown of global trade, the violence all around the place. Okay. It won't be very pretty. Okay. Yep.

Okay. But that is something that to me is in the long term. Yeah. Yep.

My question is more towards the First Nations in Canada. I know they're small and pretty unorganized, but back in 2016 they signed the China First Nations pact with the Western provinces and territories for resources like mining, water, and forestry. If China, I know you touched on China, if China doesn't have enough energy to go through with that pact, who would you see the First Nations kind of align with? I know they have only about 2 to 3% of Canadian land, but would they go with the United States or would China try and re-energize to get those resources, since they're going to be quite restricted over the next 10 years?

Okay, that's point one. Point two, and this is actually more important, is China is about to go to war with Japan and this will change everything. Okay, because what Japan can do is build an alliance to embargo China, which will force China to retreat, to basically repatriate a lot of capital and a lot of resources from overseas. So on September, you know, 10 days from now, what's going to happen is China will restrict or close its border basically. Okay. So China would basically turtle out. So a lot of actions you're seeing from China of an outward expansion will not be sustainable.

Japan will put too much pressure on China. So yeah. Okay.

So I'm better off working with the United States because they have real power, whereas the Canadians, the Europeans, the Middle Easterns, who cares? Okay. So I know that Carney does want to reach out to China, but China doesn't care. China wants to build a strong relationship with the United States. And at the end of this month, President Xi will visit Trump in Washington. It'll be a king thing, okay? It'll be a state visit, a state dinner. There'll be a lot of pomp and circumstance. But not only that, there are two more visits scheduled for the rest of this year.

One in APEC, another in the G20. So all together this year, there are four bilateral meetings between Trump and Xi. State leaders do not meet unless they are about to reach a major agreement. Okay? They don't need to fight the need in order to sign documents.

So this complex way of how the US, China and Iran are managing the oil market. I was curious about your thoughts. The secondary question is kind of more tied to what China is doing specifically. China has a relationship with Iran and China doesn't want Iran to fall. So when China reduced the import, it actually reduced the oil price a lot, which kind of counters what Iran is doing with the Strait of Hormuz. So I was curious about your thoughts of how they will navigate going forward. That's the second question I have.

Yeah. Thank you.

Okay. And today none of these three things apply. So right now they think in terms of very short-term results. Okay. Short term then it's partial and it's like basically just pathically. Okay, all right, so basically it's always a question of how do I benefit as soon as possible from what I do. Okay, so let me give you an example. A couple of years ago, there's a really famous case in China. And what happened was this business guy, this businessman, has a falling out with his business partner. So he hires a hitman to go kill his partner.

Okay, he gives a million dollars. I'm just making the summar up. Okay, he gives a million dollars to the hitman. Says, "Go kill this guy." Before 20 years ago, the hitman would just go and kill that guy. Okay? And then the business is done. Today, what that did was like, well, I could go and pull the trigger and kill a guy, but you know what? What's my best short-term personal tactical interest? Okay, I'm going to go and give half a million dollars to another guy to kill the business partner.

All right. Then the second man is like, "Well, I could go and kill the guy, but let me hire someone else to do it." So he subcontracts to the third guy, who gets $250,000 now. And then the guy's like, "Well, I'll subcontract again." And again, he gives the fourth guy $100,000, $20,000 US. And the fourth guy was like, "Well, I think they'll kill the business partner, but I can make more money by renting out the guy." Okay. So he goes to the business partner and says, "Hey, I'll give you $100,000 to kill you.

You give me $200,000. I'll go and help you." The business partner is like, "Sue you are. I'm going to report you to the police." They were all arrested. This is how the world works today. The leaders in charge, Trump, Carney, they're all like this. Okay? So you think that Carney wants to create the Western Pipeline, a 20-year project? No, he doesn't. He doesn't care. He's using it as a negotiating tactic to get the most leverage against Trump. Okay? Whenever leaders say 20 years from now or, you know, let's do this big project, it's all an illusion.

Okay? None of them actually think in these terms. All right? Yeah. So I'm curious. When you were talking in your lecture previously, you blamed the trade war on Carney. Well, I definitely, I want to say, by no means support Carney, but don't you think that Trump started it, and he started it because of the deficit? But that deficit is driven by their imports of Canadian crude, which they then refine and sell at a much higher premium, you know, back to Canada. As I said, I don't support Carney, but I've got to give credit where credit is due.

He is standing against the tariffs, right? And related to that, another question: when you're talking about, you know, the reason Poilievre lost is because he refused to blame Carney for being, you know, just in the pocket of London, right? Don't you think he didn't challenge Carney in that way because he himself is in the pocket of, you know, transnational kind of Zionist capital, right? But Poilievre actually leans more on the side of Trump, so he wasn't able to challenge Trump in the way that Carney did, which was obviously performative but nonetheless.

So how do you see what the people can do, and how are we going to be restricted to speak up, and can you comment on that?

Okay, but what I also do is I also teach the beauty of the great books. I also teach the beauty of spirituality and I talk about the importance of having a family and focusing on children, and, you know, a lot of what I do is for my kids. I want my kids to learn about the world and have more control over their own destiny, because eventually I will pass on from the scene and my kids will inherit the future, and that is what keeps me safe. So, you know, when I went to the United States I did a lot of podcasts, I met a lot of famous people, but my focus was on taking my son around and showing him.

So I think if you just focus on what you can't control, that will just make you insane. You have to focus on what things you can control, and, you know, learning by yourself, learning as much as you can, being nice to people around you, educating the people around you, that's something that you can control. Okay.

And the second question is, if let's say Poilievre won, do you think he would also be an agent of England, the City of London, or do you think he will act differently? Thank you.

Okay. People know them convenient place, you know, to be nice to our neighbor isn't there all cultures and so Yeah, so I think a lot of this anger is being driven by such powerlessness, okay, meaning Canadians are not even allowed to articulate this frustration.

There should be town hall meetings where Canadians are permitted to discuss their concerns. Okay. But the government doesn't care anymore. All right. Yes.

Are you aware of any consistent picture of the future that has been formulated and offered to the public after doom and gloom happens, except basically what Schwab offered as a dystopian world that we're supposed to live in? That's number one. And number two, from your perspective, how many generations will be wasted in that gloom and doom picture that basically everybody is accepting will happen?

Now the whole world is in disarray and nobody offers the future that we can gather around. Schwab offered it, but we know what that is.

There'll be enough resources for everyone and people would get along a lot better, right? Imagine how much space there would be, how much resource there would be if we only have 5 million people. So how do we go from 8 million people to 500 million people? Well, I think God will take care of this. Okay. But what might be important is if we make this happen as fast as possible, because if we were to accelerate the process, we would reduce human suffering. Okay. So the options aren't, you know, how do we maintain peace and prosperity, because we can't do that.

The options are, do we want to accelerate the process and make it into a 20-year process, or do we just not do anything and have the process be 200 years, because empires when they decline take 10 to about 20 200 years? Okay. Would it be better if we did it in 20 years or maybe in 10 years? Okay. That's how they're thinking.

Okay? Because that's too obvious and it would lead to disaster. What you do is you attack his lieutenants, because once his lieutenants are removed from power, he himself has actually no power whatsoever. All right. So what's been happening this past year in China is there's a constant global purge where different factions are removing each other's, their enemies from positions of power, and so they're basically neutering each other in order to create a b of power in China. Does that make sense? In which case what I'm saying is no one now is in charge of China.

President Xi could be seen as the leader, but all he's doing is implementing a consensus they agree on. And one consensus they agree on is we need international stability and we need to work states. Why? Because Japan is coming. Okay? So they agree on basic things, but right now there's really no want command, and that's why China has been so passive these past few years even though a lot of things are happening that go against Chinese national interests, especially this war in Iran. Okay. So the reporting around China is completely wrong.

No one's in charge right now. The guy is just a figurehead. There are different political factions and they're all trying to balance each other out.

So you have to believe this. Once you believe this, then everything else can fall into place. But once you accept that there is a God and that God is the source from which you come, you come here for a purpose, then for you what's important is to first of all discover your purpose and then rebuild your connection with which will lead you to your purpose.

We go farther and distance from the monad. But then watching your other videos, like "Immigration Trap in a Rat Utopia," I tried to connect the dots. And I've seen a transition when you mentioned you met your wife and you have your kids. That's when you felt comfortable with your life. But right now I'm not married. I'm a single young working force male. And I believe a lot of people are like me, and before I get married, or before a young man gets married, what would be the right income number for us to be comfortable and then we stop continuing to earn more money, because we also want to connect with the monad, right?

And money is extracted from our energy and time. Thank you so much.

Yeah, I think that's a wrong way to perceive things, like how much money do I need to make? You have to ask yourself, you know, what makes me a happy person, because once you become a happy person, you exude a positive energy and then that attracts people to you. You have more friends, you have more dating options. So for you, it's really a question of, you know, what can bring happiness to my life? And then once you have this happiness, then this will bring happiness to others.

And I think one thing that I've learned that's really helpful is the ability to tell jokes, the ability to make people laugh. What? Because to tell jokes, you have to be honest with who you are, and you have to go with your pride, and you have to put the interest of others before yourself. So I think learning to tell jokes will be much more effective than making a lot of money, right? Okay.

Okay.

This is meant to be an alternative to the current financial system which is Pax Americana. And the idea behind the SCO is the US empire is in decline and it is trying to coerce the world to follow its will. So let's come together and let's work together cooperatively to trade with each other and bring peace to the world. Okay, that's a theory. Doesn't work in practice because there are lots of internal disagreements amongst the members. Okay. So, for example, Putin was very angry because there were lots of people during the SCO who were trying to get him to stop the war in Ukraine and he's like, "What?

I just saw this war." Okay. So the SCO, it's not feasible. Okay. You need a strong leader to control this organization. It could be China if it wants to do that, because it would mean military commitments in places it doesn't want to be committed. It would also mean the liberalization of its currency, which would cause a lot of financial problems within China.